RE: [IndexedDB] Sync API for setVersion Changes

2011-04-21 Thread Israel Hilerio
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Israel Hilerio > wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > >> > >> Looks great to me. Remember that we need to make both .transaction > >> and .setVersion throw if called within the ca

Re: [IndexedDB] Sync API for setVersion Changes

2011-04-21 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> >> Looks great to me. Remember that we need to make both .transaction and >> .setVersion throw if called within the callback from either of them. >> >> / Jonas >> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 20

RE: [IndexedDB] Sync API for setVersion Changes

2011-04-21 Thread Israel Hilerio
On Mon, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > Looks great to me. Remember that we need to make both .transaction and > .setVersion throw if called within the callback from either of them. > > / Jonas > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Israel Hilerio > wrote: > > I've created a bu

Re: [IndexedDB] Sync API for setVersion Changes

2011-04-20 Thread Jonas Sicking
Looks great to me. Remember that we need to make both .transaction and .setVersion throw if called within the callback from either of them. / Jonas On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote: > I've created a bug to outline a potential change to the Sync API to handle > the context