± From: Aryeh Gregor [mailto:a...@aryeh.name]
± Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 4:59 AM
±
± On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Ms2ger wrote:
± > FWIW, Aryeh is currently studying full time and doesn't follow web
± > standards discussions regularly.
±
± I do check them from time to time, though
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Ms2ger wrote:
> FWIW, Aryeh is currently studying full time and doesn't follow web standards
> discussions regularly.
I do check them from time to time, though, and will check any personal
e-mail I receive for the time being. In particular, I'm happy to
answer a
± From: Robin Berjon [mailto:ro...@w3.org]
± Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 1:18 AM
±
± My recall is a bit rusty on that one, but I think that the situation was
± that:
±
± . WebApps is not chartered to publish this, so a CG was created.
±
± . But having the discussion on the CG list seemed li
WebApps' last discussion about `group scope` and the HTML Editing spec
was September 2011 [1]. At that time, WebApps agreed the Editing CG may
use public-webapps since WebApps' charter then permitted WebApps to
directly take on APIs that were removed from the HTML5 spec.
Robin volunteered to h
On 02/19/2013 10:17 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:
On 19/02/2013 05:56 , Travis Leithead wrote:
Alex, work on Editing APIs was ongoing in the Community Group
(http://www.w3.org/community/editing/) though their draft is just under
a year old.
My recall is a bit rusty on that one, but I think that the
On 19/02/2013 05:56 , Travis Leithead wrote:
Alex, work on Editing APIs was ongoing in the Community Group
(http://www.w3.org/community/editing/) though their draft is just under
a year old.
My recall is a bit rusty on that one, but I think that the situation was
that:
• WebApps is not chart
± From: annevankeste...@gmail.com
± Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 11:16 PM
±
± On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Alex Mogilevsky
wrote:
± > I am working on editing in IE, have issues of various scale that could
± > benefit from a discussion in standards environment. Short of creating
± > a new
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote:
> I am working on editing in IE, have issues of various scale that could
> benefit from a discussion in standards environment. Short of creating a new
> working group (which might be a good idea, but is pretty involved), is this
> the right f
place to
discuss...
From: Travis Leithead
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 8:56 PM
To: Alex Mogilevsky; Web Applications Working Group WG; Aryeh Gregor
Subject: RE: [editing] Is this the right list to discuss editing?
Alex, work on Editing APIs was ongoing in the Community Group
(http://www.w3.org
Alex, work on Editing APIs was ongoing in the Community Group
(http://www.w3.org/community/editing/) though their draft is just under a year
old.
Aryeh may have more current info...
From: Alex Mogilevsky [mailto:alex...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 8:14 PM
To: public-webapps@w
10 matches
Mail list logo
