On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 2:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Israel Hilerio
>> wrote:
>> >> On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:12 PM, Jonas Sicking
On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 2:15 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Israel Hilerio
> wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Israel Hilerio
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Israel Hilerio
> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Israel Hilerio
>>> wrote:
>>> >> >> In addition, the index method in IDBObjectS
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Israel Hilerio
>> wrote:
>> >> >> In addition, the index method in IDBObjectStore uses
>> >> >> InvalidStateError to convey two different mean
On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Israel Hilerio
> wrote:
> >> >> In addition, the index method in IDBObjectStore uses
> >> >> InvalidStateError to convey two different meanings: the object has
> >> >> been removed or deleted and the tr
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
>> >> In addition, the index method in IDBObjectStore uses
>> >> InvalidStateError to convey two different meanings: the object has
>> >> been removed or deleted and the transaction being used finished. It
>> >> seems that it would be better
On Monday, January 23, 2012 8:22 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Joshua Bell wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Israel Hilerio
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> In looking at the count method in IDBObjectStore and IDBIndex we
> >> noticed that its signature doesn't thr
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Joshua Bell wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Israel Hilerio
> wrote:
>>
>> In looking at the count method in IDBObjectStore and IDBIndex we noticed
>> that its signature doesn't throw a TransactionInactiveError when the
>> transaction being used is inacti
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Israel Hilerio wrote:
> In looking at the count method in IDBObjectStore and IDBIndex we noticed
> that its signature doesn't throw a TransactionInactiveError when the
> transaction being used is inactive. We would like to add this to the spec.
>
Agreed. FWIW, th