Hi Marcos, All,
For the purposes of my LC comments, I am satisfied with the text in P&C as it
is in section 7.4.
Thanks,
Marcin
Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com
From: p
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Marcin Hanclik
wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
>
>
>
> It seems I found another problem in RFC.
>
>
>
> 7.4
>
> valid-MIME-type = type "/" subtype *(";" parameter)
>
> and we refer to RFC2045 that says:
>
> [1] content := "Content-Type" ":" type "/" subtype
>
>
probably not fix it here.
Thanks,
Marcin
____________________
From: marcosscace...@gmail.com [marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marcos
Caceres [marc...@opera.com]
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 7:31 PM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: WebApps WG
Subject: Re: [widgets] LCWD#3 comm
;mail industry", therefore we
will probably not fix it here.
LOL, this stuff truly is turtles all the way down! :)
Thanks,
Marcin
________________
From: marcosscace...@gmail.com [marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Marcos Caceres [marc...@opera.com]
Sent: F
ra.com]
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 9:38 PM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: WebApps WG
Subject: Re: [widgets] LCWD#3 comments (3)
On Nov 20, 2009, at 8:24 PM, Marcin Hanclik wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
>
>>> I don't know, maybe parameter allows spaces? but yeah, that first
>>> spac
