On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Pablo Castro wrote:
>
> From: Jeremy Orlow
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 6:54 AM
>
> >> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Jonas Sicking
> wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow
> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:42 PM, wrote:
> >> >>
> >
From: Jeremy Orlow
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 6:54 AM
>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:42 PM, wrote:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9793
>> >>
>> >>
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:42 PM, wrote:
> >>
> >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9793
> >>
> >> Summary: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys
> >>
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> As for the keyPath issue. The way the spec stands now (where I think
> it intends not to allow full expressions), I don't think it really
> depends on Javascript. It does depend on the language having some way
> to represent structured data.
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:42 PM, wrote:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9793
>>
>> Summary: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys
>> Product: WebAppsWG
>> Version: unspecified
>>
On May 24, 2010, at 3:30 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On May 22, 2010, at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
> > Even though no one is currently considering implementing this outside of
> > JavaScript land and even though it'll limit us s
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On May 22, 2010, at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
> > Even though no one is currently considering implementing this outside of
> JavaScript land and even though it'll limit us some and making speccing
> harder, I think it'd be a mista
On May 22, 2010, at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
> Even though no one is currently considering implementing this outside of
> JavaScript land and even though it'll limit us some and making speccing
> harder, I think it'd be a mistake to depend on JavaScript. And, as far as I
> can tell, the w
