Microsoft supports this call.
On Tuesday, May 1, 2012 9:26 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> During WebApps' May 1 discussion about Web Components, a proposal was
> made ([1],[2]) to stop work on the XBL2 spec and this is a Call for
> Consensus to do do.
>
> If you have any comments or concerns about t
On Wed, 02 May 2012 06:26:26 +0200, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
During WebApps' May 1 discussion about Web Components, a proposal was
made ([1],[2]) to stop work on the XBL2 spec and this is a Call for
Consensus to do do.
please do.
cheers
If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC,
On Wed, 02 May 2012 19:00:48 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:35:45 -0700, Ian Hickson wrote:
> What happens if it doesn't pass?
I guess we'll reevaluate then.
How would this be different than what we've been doing for the past y
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>
> So you're blocking the resolution on Process grounds? ^_^
Not blocking anything, I am just baffled by the concept that we need to
agree to tell people the truth, and by the concept that if we agree to not
work on something, we have to do more work
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2012, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:35:45 -0700, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> > What happens if it doesn't pass?
>>
>> I guess we'll reevaluate then.
>
> How would this be different than what we've been doing for th
On Wed, 2 May 2012, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:35:45 -0700, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > What happens if it doesn't pass?
>
> I guess we'll reevaluate then.
How would this be different than what we've been doing for the past year?
As far as I can tell, the current situation is
On Tue, 01 May 2012 21:35:45 -0700, Ian Hickson wrote:
What happens if it doesn't pass?
I guess we'll reevaluate then.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On Tue, 1 May 2012, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
> During WebApps' May 1 discussion about Web Components, a proposal was
> made ([1],[2]) to stop work on the XBL2 spec and this is a Call for
> Consensus to do do.
>
> If this CfC passes, the spec will be republished as a WG Note (as was
> done with o
