RE: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?

2009-09-16 Thread Marcin Hanclik
: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com -Original Message- From: marcosscace...@gmail.com [mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 4:17 PM To: Marcin Hanclik Cc: Robin Berjon; public-webapps WG Subject: Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI

Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?

2009-09-16 Thread Marcos Caceres
Marcin, Lets try this another way. Can you make me a widget that explicitly demos the problem? I will then run it against our implementation and see what happens. I will also add the widget to the test suite, to make sure we expose and potential misunderstandings in the spec wrt URIs. Kind regard

Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?

2009-09-16 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Marcin Hanclik wrote: > Hi Marcos, > >>>So it turns out that %-encoded really just means "replace this '%xx' >>>with UTF-8 bytes". > Yes. > >>>So we don't need to do anything. > P&C shall state the actual algorithm and equivalence. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD

RE: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?

2009-09-16 Thread Marcin Hanclik
290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465 Mobile: +49-163-8290-646 E-Mail: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com -Original Message- From: marcosscace...@gmail.com [mailto:marcosscace...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 2:28 PM To: Marcin Hanclik Cc: Robin Berjon;

Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?

2009-09-10 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > Marcin Hanclik wrote: >> >> Hi Marcos, >> >> Thanks for your comments. >> It seems we are aligned. >> UAs will just have to deal with that internally >> >> I assume there could be an easy solution to the normalization: >> The normaliz

Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?

2009-09-10 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > Marcin Hanclik wrote: >> >> Hi Marcos, >> >> Thanks for your comments. >> It seems we are aligned. >> UAs will just have to deal with that internally >> >> I assume there could be an easy solution to the normalization: >> The normaliz

Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?

2009-09-08 Thread Marcos Caceres
Marcin Hanclik wrote: Hi Marcos, Thanks for your comments. It seems we are aligned. UAs will just have to deal with that internally I assume there could be an easy solution to the normalization: The normalization / mandating some equivalence-determining algorithm (from RFC3987) could go in

RE: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?

2009-09-08 Thread Marcin Hanclik
.com] Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 4:33 PM To: Marcin Hanclik Cc: Robin Berjon; public-webapps WG Subject: Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI? Marcin Hanclik wrote: > Hi Marcos, > >>> The spec just treats them as opaque strings. > Yes. Thi

Re: Normalization, was: RE: [Widget URI] Internationalization, widget IRI?

2009-09-07 Thread Marcos Caceres
Marcin Hanclik wrote: Hi Marcos, The spec just treats them as opaque strings. Yes. This is the reason for my email to I18N. Ok, so what you are saying is, given an XML document's encoding, any URI should be converted to a default encoding (say, UTF-8)? This is one of the proposed solutio