On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
> I just produced an update of VMMF to make it ready for publication:
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/.
>
> Essentially I changed it so that it corresponds to CSS Media Queries. That,
> plus it being a UI oriented specification, means
On Mar 10, 2010, at 09:55 , timeless wrote:
> Just to be difficult, i object to maximized being misspelled by an
> old-worlder. I'd suggest "max" or "maxed" as a compromise :)
Since we're being pedantic, it's incorrect to consider -ize as a new-worlderism
— in many cases both are "correct" in pro
ps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of timeless
Sent: 10 March 2010 08:55
To: Robin Berjon
Cc: public-webapps WG
Subject: Re: VMMF — new version
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
> I just produced an update of VMMF to make it ready for publication:
> htt
On Mar 10, 2010, at 16:29 , David Rogers wrote:
> A small comment. It's probably best to use the OED for English dictionary
> words rather than a google search:
> http://www.askoxford.com/results/?view=dict&freesearch=immersive&branch=13842570&textsearchtype=exact
Well, maybe not — the OED seems
Hi Robin,
I've not gotten the cycles to finish the review below... However,
before it's any later, this spec needs to define when the width and
height of a widget can be ignored/used:
P&C sez:
"7.6.3. The height Attribute
A numeric attribute greater than 0 that indicates the preferred
viewport h
Hi Robin,
I'm not sure how far forward we are with this but looking at the
security considerations, it would be useful to have the examples for
implementers to understand where we're coming from with the concerns.
For your info, this was the original proposal I discussed with Marcin:
Security Con
Hi David,
On Mar 24, 2010, at 20:10 , David Rogers wrote:
> I'm not sure how far forward we are with this but looking at the
> security considerations, it would be useful to have the examples for
> implementers to understand where we're coming from with the concerns.
Thanks, I've incorporated the
