RfC: Is Web Sockets API ready for LC publication? [Was: Re: [websockets] Getting WebSockets API to Last Call]

Hixie, Brian, Jonas, All, Since Brian sent the original e-mail [1], there has been some Bugzilla activity and there are now 5 open bugs for Web Sockets. It appears to me (and please correct me if I'm wrong) the ".binaryType" issue Jonas raised on the list [2] will not result in any spec change

Re: RfC: Is Web Sockets API ready for LC publication? [Was: Re: [websockets] Getting WebSockets API to Last Call]

As an update on this RfC, note that ATM, 13777 is the only non-editorial bug that remains open: I would appreciate it, if people would please provide input on this bug. -AB On 9/9/11 6:05 PM, ext Brian Raymor wrote: 13777 - The WebSocke

Re: RfC: Is Web Sockets API ready for LC publication? [Was: Re: [websockets] Getting WebSockets API to Last Call]

Yesterday, Hixie checked in a fix for 13777. Bug 13104 (Enable keepalive on WebSocket API) was closed (WontFix) but reopened on September 18. Since various group members agree with not addressing this bug for v1, I will proceed with a CfC to publish a LC of the Web Socket API. (Perhaps this bu