Re: Service worker F2F meeting - 26th Jan - San Francisco

2016-01-19 Thread Ben Kelly
FYI, it turns out I am going to have to attend virtually. This should not be a problem since the meeting is taking place in a mozilla conference room with our standard vidyo setup. I am planning to be on vidyo for the meeting all day. I'm sorry for the change here, but some personal events

Re: Service worker F2F meeting - 26th Jan - San Francisco

2016-01-05 Thread Jake Archibald
Updated https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/806 with attendees, including Ilya & Conrad. On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 at 00:27 Ilya Grigorik wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Anne van Kesteren > wrote: > >> We have three more seats at this

Service worker F2F meeting - 26th Jan - San Francisco

2016-01-04 Thread Jake Archibald
Since many of those involved in service workers will be in town for the web components meeting on the 25th ( https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/blob/gh-pages/meetings/25janWC.md) we're having a service workers meeting on the 26th. The meeting is being hosted by Mozilla

Re: Service worker F2F meeting - 26th Jan - San Francisco

2016-01-04 Thread Ilya Grigorik
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > We have three more seats at this point, allocated on the basis of > first come, first served. > If any are still available, I'd like to reserve one as well :)

Re: Service worker F2F meeting - 26th Jan - San Francisco

2016-01-04 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Conrad Irwin wrote: > I'd be interested in attending as a relatively mute observer. We've been > using service workers for a while now, and I'd like to get more involved. Great, you're in, no need to be mute though. We have three more

Re: Service worker F2F meeting - 26th Jan - San Francisco

2016-01-04 Thread Conrad Irwin
I'd be interested in attending as a relatively mute observer. We've been using service workers for a while now, and I'd like to get more involved. Conrad On Monday, January 4, 2016, Jake Archibald wrote: > Since many of those involved in service workers will be in