On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:57:06 +0200, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> I’d like to know what specs are currently using Web IDL, so that I can
> keep abreast of what features are being used and help to review them.
> This is what I have so far:
>
> [...]
>
> Are there any others people are aware of?
htt
On Jul 16, 2009, at 11:27 , Simon Pieters wrote:
Web DOM Core
http://simon.html5.org/specs/web-dom-core
This spec would probably benefit from being moved to W3C space. As
it happens, I would like to know if someone is interested in editing
Web DOM Core. Maybe someone from Apple or Mozilla?
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:57:06 +0200, Cameron McCormack
wrote:
I’d like to know what specs are currently using Web IDL, so that I can
keep abreast of what features are being used and help to review them.
This is what I have so far:
HTML 5
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/
Server-Sent Events
Doug Schepers:
> Maybe we should have a LC to draw out these comments...
Using LC to get detailed review seems fine. I suppose it will be in the
interests of authors of specs dependent on Web IDL to ensure that the
details are correct before it gets more mature.
> if not now, what timeframe are
Hi, again-
Oops, email sent too soon... I need to disable the keyboard shortcut for
"Send" on Thunderbird, it's very annoying.
Email finished inline
Doug Schepers wrote (on 6/28/09 3:37 PM):
Hi, Cam-
Cameron McCormack wrote (on 6/28/09 7:10 AM):
Robin Berjon:
I wonder what the value i
Hi, Cam-
Cameron McCormack wrote (on 6/28/09 7:10 AM):
Robin Berjon:
I wonder what the value is of having it on Rec track in the first place?
Could it simply be a Note?
I’d be reluctant to make it a note, given the normative requirements it
makes of implementations of a given IDL fragment.
Doug Schepers:
> As we talked about at the SVG F2F, we need to have a discussion about
> what the exit criteria for Web IDL will be, since the implementations
> are actually other specs, and there is concurrent development between
> those specs and Web IDL. This seems to be a special case wi
Robin Berjon:
> I wonder what the value is of having it on Rec track in the first place?
> Could it simply be a Note?
I’d be reluctant to make it a note, given the normative requirements it
makes of implementations of a given IDL fragment.
--
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:49:46 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote:
I wonder what the value is of having it on Rec track in the first place?
Could it simply be a Note?
Only if it makes sense to require in a Rec that the things in the relevant
Note MUST be followed. I believe that has been controversial
On Jun 27, 2009, at 22:24 , Doug Schepers wrote:
As we talked about at the SVG F2F, we need to have a discussion
about what the exit criteria for Web IDL will be, since the
implementations are actually other specs, and there is concurrent
development between those specs and Web IDL. This se
Hi, Cameron-
SVG Parameters
http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGParam/
It's likely that most or all the new SVG specs will use Web IDL.
As we talked about at the SVG F2F, we need to have a discussion about
what the exit criteria for Web IDL will be, since the implementations
are actually other specs, a
On Jun 27, 2009, at 2:57 AM, ext Cameron McCormack wrote:
I’d like to know what specs are currently using Web IDL, so that I can
keep abreast of what features are being used and help to review them.
This is what I have so far:
...
Are there any others people are aware of?
Widgets APIs and
I’d like to know what specs are currently using Web IDL, so that I can
keep abreast of what features are being used and help to review them.
This is what I have so far:
HTML 5
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/
Server-Sent Events
http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/
The Web Sockets API
ht
13 matches
Mail list logo
