On 6/23/11, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> On Jun/23/2011 6:45 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:36:07 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
>> wrote:
>>> I just checked in the proposal
>>> https://bitbucket.org/ms2ger/dom-core/changeset/b9bb17789db9 into DOM
>>> Core but I suspect it needs
On Jun/23/2011 6:45 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:36:07 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
wrote:
I just checked in the proposal
https://bitbucket.org/ms2ger/dom-core/changeset/b9bb17789db9 into DOM
Core but I suspect it needs some refining and reviewing. I suspect we
need ano
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:36:07 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
wrote:
I just checked in the proposal
https://bitbucket.org/ms2ger/dom-core/changeset/b9bb17789db9 into DOM
Core but I suspect it needs some refining and reviewing. I suspect we
need another Progress Events LC for this as technically it
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:44:36 +0200, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
On Jun/22/2011 6:28 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
So a) maybe we should hold off on going to CR until the new way of
initializing events is settled in DOM Core
What is the approximate time frame for that?
I just checked in the p
On Jun/22/2011 6:28 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Since this relates to the CR of Progress Events I thought I would
bring it up on this list instead of one of the testing mailing lists.
Progress Events depends a lot on other specifications. Basically the
only thing that can be tested is crea
Since this relates to the CR of Progress Events I thought I would bring it
up on this list instead of one of the testing mailing lists. Progress
Events depends a lot on other specifications. Basically the only thing
that can be tested is creating synthetic events and seeing whether the
inte
