Re: VMMF - new version

2010-04-12 Thread Robin Berjon
Hi David, On Mar 24, 2010, at 20:10 , David Rogers wrote: > I'm not sure how far forward we are with this but looking at the > security considerations, it would be useful to have the examples for > implementers to understand where we're coming from with the concerns. Thanks, I've incorporated the

RE: VMMF - new version

2010-03-24 Thread David Rogers
webapps WG Subject: VMMF - new version Hi all, I just produced an update of VMMF to make it ready for publication: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/. Essentially I changed it so that it corresponds to CSS Media Queries. That, plus it being a UI oriented specification, means that there's onl

Re: VMMF — new version

2010-03-16 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Robin, I've not gotten the cycles to finish the review below... However, before it's any later, this spec needs to define when the width and height of a widget can be ignored/used: P&C sez: "7.6.3. The height Attribute A numeric attribute greater than 0 that indicates the preferred viewport h

Re: VMMF — new version

2010-03-10 Thread Robin Berjon
On Mar 10, 2010, at 16:29 , David Rogers wrote: > A small comment. It's probably best to use the OED for English dictionary > words rather than a google search: > http://www.askoxford.com/results/?view=dict&freesearch=immersive&branch=13842570&textsearchtype=exact Well, maybe not — the OED seems

RE: VMMF — new version

2010-03-10 Thread David Rogers
ps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of timeless Sent: 10 March 2010 08:55 To: Robin Berjon Cc: public-webapps WG Subject: Re: VMMF — new version On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: > I just produced an update of VMMF to make it ready for publication: > htt

Re: VMMF — new version

2010-03-10 Thread Robin Berjon
On Mar 10, 2010, at 09:55 , timeless wrote: > Just to be difficult, i object to maximized being misspelled by an > old-worlder. I'd suggest "max" or "maxed" as a compromise :) Since we're being pedantic, it's incorrect to consider -ize as a new-worlderism — in many cases both are "correct" in pro

Re: VMMF — new version

2010-03-10 Thread timeless
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: > I just produced an update of VMMF to make it ready for publication: > http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/. > > Essentially I changed it so that it corresponds to CSS Media Queries. That, > plus it being a UI oriented specification, means

VMMF — new version

2010-03-04 Thread Robin Berjon
Hi all, I just produced an update of VMMF to make it ready for publication: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/. Essentially I changed it so that it corresponds to CSS Media Queries. That, plus it being a UI oriented specification, means that there's only one normative assertion and it's