On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:18 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Doug Schepers wrote:
Jonas and others seem to support broadening the scope, and I've also
been reading various posts in the blogosphere that also question
whether
SQL is the right choice (I see a lot of support for JSON-b
On Apr 23, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Folks-
I discussed this a bit with Nikunj offline, in the context of the
charter wording. He and I both agreed that the scope of the charter
was too narrow (that was my fault; I changed the wording to reflect
the abstract of the curr
Sounds good to me.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Doug Schepers wrote:
> Hi, Folks-
>
> I discussed this a bit with Nikunj offline, in the context of the charter
> wording. He and I both agreed that the scope of the charter was too narrow
> (that was my fault; I changed the wording to reflect
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Doug Schepers wrote:
>
> Jonas and others seem to support broadening the scope, and I've also
> been reading various posts in the blogosphere that also question whether
> SQL is the right choice (I see a lot of support for JSON-based
> approaches). At the very least, I thi
Hi, Folks-
I discussed this a bit with Nikunj offline, in the context of the
charter wording. He and I both agreed that the scope of the charter was
too narrow (that was my fault; I changed the wording to reflect the
abstract of the current Web Storage spec, and I probably shouldn't
have), b
