On Sep 28, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Hi All,
Wow! The amount of email on Web IDL over the last few days has been
amazing!
I am wondering out loud here if it would make sense to split up the
Web IDL spec? For example, a functional split e.g. the IDL in one
doc, ES 3/5 bind
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:40:20 +0200, Arthur Barstow
wrote:
Wow! The amount of email on Web IDL over the last few days has been
amazing!
I am wondering out loud here if it would make sense to split up the Web
IDL spec? For example, a functional split e.g. the IDL in one doc, ES
3/5 binding
Hi Art,
On Sep 28, 2009, at 14:40 , Arthur Barstow wrote:
I am wondering out loud here if it would make sense to split up the
Web IDL spec? For example, a functional split e.g. the IDL in one
doc, ES 3/5 bindings in a separate doc, Java bindings in a separate
doc, etc. Or a core/non-core (e
Hi All,
Wow! The amount of email on Web IDL over the last few days has been
amazing!
I am wondering out loud here if it would make sense to split up the
Web IDL spec? For example, a functional split e.g. the IDL in one
doc, ES 3/5 bindings in a separate doc, Java bindings in a separate