Re: WebIDL: how to address the various audiences and constraints?

2009-09-28 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Sep 28, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Hi All, Wow! The amount of email on Web IDL over the last few days has been amazing! I am wondering out loud here if it would make sense to split up the Web IDL spec? For example, a functional split e.g. the IDL in one doc, ES 3/5 bind

Re: WebIDL: how to address the various audiences and constraints?

2009-09-28 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:40:20 +0200, Arthur Barstow wrote: Wow! The amount of email on Web IDL over the last few days has been amazing! I am wondering out loud here if it would make sense to split up the Web IDL spec? For example, a functional split e.g. the IDL in one doc, ES 3/5 binding

Re: WebIDL: how to address the various audiences and constraints?

2009-09-28 Thread Robin Berjon
Hi Art, On Sep 28, 2009, at 14:40 , Arthur Barstow wrote: I am wondering out loud here if it would make sense to split up the Web IDL spec? For example, a functional split e.g. the IDL in one doc, ES 3/5 bindings in a separate doc, Java bindings in a separate doc, etc. Or a core/non-core (e

WebIDL: how to address the various audiences and constraints?

2009-09-28 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, Wow! The amount of email on Web IDL over the last few days has been amazing! I am wondering out loud here if it would make sense to split up the Web IDL spec? For example, a functional split e.g. the IDL in one doc, ES 3/5 bindings in a separate doc, Java bindings in a separate