Re: XHR2 proposal: support for informational responses

On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > it might be cool (and not too complicated) to (optionally) expose 1xx > responses to the caller (see > ). There's one application I know of (not browser based) which regularly report

Re: XHR2 proposal: support for informational responses

On 10.09.2010 17:21, Nathan wrote: Julian Reschke wrote: Hi, it might be cool (and not too complicated) to (optionally) expose 1xx responses to the caller (see ). This could be done through an opt-in, such as specifying a callback funct

Re: XHR2 proposal: support for informational responses

Nathan wrote: Julian Reschke wrote: Hi, it might be cool (and not too complicated) to (optionally) expose 1xx responses to the caller (see ). This could be done through an opt-in, such as specifying a callback function to be called

Re: XHR2 proposal: support for informational responses

Julian Reschke wrote: Hi, it might be cool (and not too complicated) to (optionally) expose 1xx responses to the caller (see ). This could be done through an opt-in, such as specifying a callback function to be called asynchronously

XHR2 proposal: support for informational responses

Hi, it might be cool (and not too complicated) to (optionally) expose 1xx responses to the caller (see ). This could be done through an opt-in, such as specifying a callback function to be called asynchronously when the messages come