Re: progress events in sync XHR not entirely ruled out

2011-02-03 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:27:57 +0100, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:54:15 +0100, Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com wrote: In the XHR2 spec, most references to progress events make it clear that they're only sent for asynchronous XHRs. However, in three cases, the

Re: progress events in sync XHR not entirely ruled out

2010-11-25 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:54:15 +0100, Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com wrote: In the XHR2 spec, most references to progress events make it clear that they're only sent for asynchronous XHRs. However, in three cases, the events aren't written as being exclusive to the async case. I'm guessing these

progress events in sync XHR not entirely ruled out

2010-11-24 Thread Eric Uhrhane
In the XHR2 spec, most references to progress events make it clear that they're only sent for asynchronous XHRs. However, in three cases, the events aren't written as being exclusive to the async case. I'm guessing these are just oversights: 1)