On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 14:27:57 +0100, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:54:15 +0100, Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com
wrote:
In the XHR2 spec, most references to progress events make it clear
that they're only sent for asynchronous XHRs. However, in three
cases, the
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:54:15 +0100, Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com wrote:
In the XHR2 spec, most references to progress events make it clear
that they're only sent for asynchronous XHRs. However, in three
cases, the events aren't written as being exclusive to the async case.
I'm guessing these
In the XHR2 spec, most references to progress events make it clear
that they're only sent for asynchronous XHRs. However, in three
cases, the events aren't written as being exclusive to the async case.
I'm guessing these are just oversights:
1)