On Tuesday, December 22, 2009 2:39 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> I have published a non-JS version of the same document as the pub-
> ready WD. You can take a look at it:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebSimpleDB/
>
> I hope that works for you.
>
> Nikunj
Looks good. Thanks N
Hi Adrian,
I have published a non-JS version of the same document as the pub-
ready WD. You can take a look at it:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebSimpleDB/
I hope that works for you.
Nikunj
On Dec 21, 2009, at 6:58 PM, Adrian Bateman wrote:
On Monday, December 21, 2009 6:43 PM, I wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:43:21 +0100, Adrian Bateman
wrote:
Microsoft supports publishing a new Working Draft.
As does Opera (sorry, I have been offline)
cheers
Chaaks
On Monday, December 14, 2009 12:54 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new Working
On Monday, December 21, 2009 6:43 PM, I wrote:
> Microsoft supports publishing a new Working Draft.
>
> However, there appears to be a problem with the Respec.js script at
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebSimpleDB/.
Apparently, the script takes some time to run (at least when I tried it in
Fir
Microsoft supports publishing a new Working Draft.
However, there appears to be a problem with the Respec.js script at
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebSimpleDB/.
On Monday, December 14, 2009 12:54 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new Working Draft of
>
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a new Working Draft of
the Indexed Database API spec with a new short-name of "indexeddb":
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebSimpleDB/
As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and
encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent
