Re: [Pulp-dev] De-duplicating Demo Content

2017-09-29 Thread Brian Bouterse
I've thought about this some more and given my role as the community manager, I would like to host the demos and deliver the content I have planned. This is what I see from other projects like Foreman. This content regularly conflicts with the "State of Pulp" content. The YouTube live demos are som

Re: [Pulp-dev] FilterSets in plugin API

2017-09-29 Thread Brian Bouterse
I'm not totally sure on this, but I think since the pulp_file plugin is defining the File content type and additional fields it has to also define the filterset that goes with it. Can someone else with more DRF experience confirm that plugin writers must define a filterset for pulp to work? Or cou

Re: [Pulp-dev] De-duplicating Demo Content

2017-09-29 Thread Michael Hrivnak
Sure, I'd be happy to do that. I do think there's plenty of room for a "What's happening with the technology" segment and a "What else is going on in the community" segment if you'd like to keep doing highlights there, but otherwise I am happy to take care of it. On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:43 AM, B

Re: [Pulp-dev] Reconsidering PUP-3

2017-09-29 Thread Brian Bouterse
+1 I believe the cherry picking approach will avoid merge-forward problems we've experienced, allow for less friction during community contribution, and create a more stable project overall. On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Dennis Kliban wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:17 AM, David Da

Re: [Pulp-dev] Reconsidering PUP-3

2017-09-29 Thread Dennis Kliban
+1 On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:17 AM, David Davis wrote: > I went back and looked at PUP-3 and it does lay out some of the items > @pcreech mentions although at a higher, more general level. I’ll leave the > document as is unless someone disagrees. > > With that in mind, let's go ahead and vote on

Re: [Pulp-dev] De-duplicating Demo Content

2017-09-29 Thread Brian Bouterse
The content you are describing is the same content I usually plan to cover also. Then on the day-of we realize that we have the same content. I think this is the root of the issue that is causing me to raise this problem to begin with. Switching the name won't resolve it. In looking at a community

Re: [Pulp-dev] Reconsidering PUP-3

2017-09-29 Thread David Davis
I went back and looked at PUP-3 and it does lay out some of the items @pcreech mentions although at a higher, more general level. I’ll leave the document as is unless someone disagrees. With that in mind, let's go ahead and vote on PUP-3. We’ll end the voting on October 8th which is about 10 days