I agree that we want to highlight community contributions, but I don't
understand why we would want to separate them from other user facing
changes. As a user/developer watching the demo, it doesn't make a
difference to me where the content came from.
Here's what I'm thinking:
*Release updates*
+1
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Ina Panova wrote:
> I think it is important to keep 2 sections:
> 1) Community updates - which would tackle community contributions and
> everything related to the spread of our project awareness.
> 2) Release updates- which would take care of RFEs, bugfixes, issue
