I put in a PR[0] to fix the actual incompatibility.
[0] https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/3186
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> 2.6.4 should have read 3.6.4
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Brian Bouterse
> wrote:
>
>> Today DRF pushed 3.7.0 to PyPI which breaks th
Today DRF pushed 3.7.0 to PyPI which breaks the pulp, the docs builders and
vagrant environments. This issue is tracked here [0] along with a
workaround for your vagrant environment.
I think we should triage [0] onto the sprint w/ high prio. Should we?
The resolution of [0] is to update Pulp to b
2.6.4 should have read 3.6.4
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> Today DRF pushed 3.7.0 to PyPI which breaks the pulp, the docs builders
> and vagrant environments. This issue is tracked here [0] along with a
> workaround for your vagrant environment.
>
> I think we should
Sounds great!
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> +1 to this being made. When its up, maybe send a link so we can add some
> content too.
>
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Austin Macdonald
> wrote:
>
>> Unless this already exists somewhere, I think it would be nice to ha
+1 to this being made. When its up, maybe send a link so we can add some
content too.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Austin Macdonald wrote:
> Unless this already exists somewhere, I think it would be nice to have a
> new wiki document called "Requested Plugins". For each plugin, we might
> in
Unless this already exists somewhere, I think it would be nice to have a
new wiki document called "Requested Plugins". For each plugin, we might
include a brief description, links to related docs, and redmine issues if
we have any. I think this would help us to prioritize them, and provide a
good
