>
> Cons:
>
>1. Lost investment in nesting.
>2. Different structure than Pulp 2.
>
> The "lost investment in nesting" con isn't a con. This is an example of
the the "sunk cost" fallacy.
I don't think it matters much if our URL structure is different than in
Pulp 2. Pulp 3 is already massiv
We recently decided to reference objects by their pks in the urls,
primarily so they will be immutable. Problem: UUIDs are long, and not human
friendly. Add nesting and urls get ugly.
Nested PK URL for a Publication (artist's rendering):
http://pulp3.dev:8000/api/v3/repositories/a6287821-5d13-4
On Tuesday we started to go over filtering in the MVP and we knocked out a
bunch of models. I’m hoping to finish up filtering tomorrow so I wanted to
email out some info to help prepare for our discussion.
First, I went ahead and added links to the code for the models that are
remaining. If you al
