Re: [Pulp-dev] Seeking Nomenclature

We also have called it "Pulp to Pulp sync" informally. On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:23 PM, David Davis wrote: > So syncing from one Pulp server to another Pulp server is usually called > 'natural syncing'. See [0][1]. > > AFAIK, there is no official concept of

Re: [Pulp-dev] Seeking Nomenclature

So syncing from one Pulp server to another Pulp server is usually called 'natural syncing'. See [0][1]. AFAIK, there is no official concept of master/nodes/etc in Pulp anymore since in the case of natural syncing, there’s nothing special about either instance of Pulp. We have used the terms

[Pulp-dev] Seeking Nomenclature

Howdy, The simple question is there any nomenclature used when referring to a Pulp server and another Pulp server that syncs from the previous one? The background behind this question is as follows. Pulp at a time had the concept of masters and nodes. With the removal of the official

[Pulp-dev] Pulp 3 MVP test plans

Last week we agreed to help QE by opening issues in the pulp-smash Github tracker for Pulp 3 user stories/features. I just wanted to remind everyone to (1) open pulp-smash issues for features/user stories that you have already completed and (2) open pulp-smash issues for stories you complete going

Re: [Pulp-dev] issue #3360 follow up

I like the name ‘mirror_repository_version’ unless someone has a better proposal. David On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Dennis Kliban wrote: > Earlier today several of us discussed issue 3360[0]. In our discussion we > concluded that it is valuable for users to be able to