I've finished my review and resolved all of the 'blocker' issues that were
uncovered during testing. Overall, I'm highly confident that this is a
better path forwards than the continued use of Celery / Kombu. There are a
couple of outstanding edge cases to be resolved eventually, which I plan to
Is there a specific user case that requires that a publisher and a
publication to be part of a distribution?
Thanks,
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Austin Macdonald
wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Brian Bouterse
> wrote:
>
>> I'm confused about the feature claim of the auto-dis
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> I'm confused about the feature claim of the auto-distribute feature for
> Pulp 3.0 GA. The distribution object takes both 'repository' and
> 'publisher' as options currently...
>
> As a user, can I create a distribution that will auto-distr
I'm confused about the feature claim of the auto-distribute feature for
Pulp 3.0 GA. The distribution object takes both 'repository' and
'publisher' as options currently...
As a user, can I create a distribution that will auto-distribute any new
repository version for repo 'foo'?
As a user, can I
