-1
Milan has been a great contributor to the Pulp 2 RPM effort. I am looking
forward to all the future contributions in both Pulp 2 and Pulp 3. However,
after collaborating with Milan on issue 2619[0], I decided that he needs
more mentorship. I can provide more feedback directly to you Milan.
+1, I agree that Milan has met the criteria. I think we should go forward
with giving him the bit and larger discussions about decision making can
happen separately.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:03 AM Ina Panova wrote:
> Brian,
>
> it feels like your reply is in contradiction of what we are trying
Brian,
it feels like your reply is in contradiction of what we are trying to
achieve as a community project:
1) I am concerned that this reply can be perceived very badly by the
community, especially once we approved the pup and announced this in hope
of community embracing this change, by
Hi,
I'd like to propose a comparison of Git versioning model to Pulp3
versioning (and branching) model.
The textual part would briefly introduce both Git and Pulp, with focus on
their respective usecases, trying to identify overlapping scenarios.
Next it would in detail examine the versioning
