Everyone has turned on 2FA so the requirement for our Pulp organization in
Github has been enabled. Thanks to everyone for setting up 2FA!
David
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:11 AM David Davis wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who enabled 2FA before the deadline. We’re going to
> wait until the end of
Thanks all of you guys, especially Milan! We wrote specific assignment and
sent it to the school, we've been waiting for the feedback from the
professor. After that we will post it here.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 6:17 PM Milan Kovacik wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:52 PM Michael Hrivnak
>
Yeah, agreed, not sure it's worth the effort and not sure that would even
work depending on exactly what markers they're looking for like in their
own templates. Not sure how many community members would check the
Insights tab before looking at our actual repo or website and get the wrong
idea. I
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:52 PM Michael Hrivnak wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Milan Kovacik
> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> we've been discussing my proposal with Vlada recently and he's about to
>> commit officially to it at the school.
>> I'd like to poke for feedback esp. if there are
Thanks for reaching out to Github. I noticed this issue too. I wonder if
copying our Code of Conduct to CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md would fix the problem.
I’m not sure what sort of check they’re using but I guess we can try it and
find out. Personally though, I am not sure what the tool detecting our code
o
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:34 PM David Davis wrote:
> Our previous experiment was to analyze two different ways to store content
> for a repository version: a direct relationship between a version and
> content vs storing diffs between versions (which we have adopted in Pulp
> 3). So we didn’t rea
Are we ok with GitHub's automation not detecting our Code of Conduct? See
forwarded message below. I am, especially since it's a known issue they
have a ticket open to improve, but wanted to ask the rest of you.
Options:
A) Leave as is, so we only have to maintain it in one place (our website)
a
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote:
> Folks,
>
> we've been discussing my proposal with Vlada recently and he's about to
> commit officially to it at the school.
> I'd like to poke for feedback esp. if there are concerns/doubts about the
> sanity of my proposal.
> Encouraging co
Our previous experiment was to analyze two different ways to store content
for a repository version: a direct relationship between a version and
content vs storing diffs between versions (which we have adopted in Pulp
3). So we didn’t really examine different branching models and I wouldn’t
really
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 11:14 PM David Davis wrote:
> I’m interested to know more about this versioning/branching proposal and
> its goals. I assume this would be to explore changing Pulp 3 to use a
> non-linear branching model?
>
The main goal of the thesis would be to compare Git and Pulp vers
10 matches
Mail list logo
