Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to remove 'notes' fields from the Pulp 3 RC

+1 Dana Walker Associate Software Engineer Red Hat On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 1:52 PM Tatiana Tereshchenko wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:49 PM Brian Bouterse wrote: > >> +1. Ty for bringing this up @dalley >> >> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10

[Pulp-dev] Changes to pulp’s directory structure

As part of https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4101, the pulp repository[0] will be restructured so that the source code will be in the pulpcore/ subdirectory instead of in pulpcore/pulpcore/. Unless anyone objects, I hope to do this at the end of this week. If you have any changes, open PRs, etc, I would

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal: merge the content-app & streamer

+1 to merge +1 to have clear docs for plugin writers how to create their own content app On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:25 PM Dennis Kliban wrote: > It was pointed out on IRC that plugins that have to supply their own > content app (such as docker) currently need to supply 2 implementations of > it i

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to remove 'notes' fields from the Pulp 3 RC

+1 On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:49 PM Brian Bouterse wrote: > +1. Ty for bringing this up @dalley > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:47 AM Jeff Ortel wrote: > >> no objection >> >> On 12/3/18 10:32 PM, Daniel Alley wrote: >> >> *Background:* >> >> "Notes" are a generic key value store where data can be

Re: [Pulp-dev] Distributing Pulp3 Plans

+1 On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 5:54 PM Daniel Alley wrote: > No objection > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:52 AM Jeff Ortel wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On 12/1/18 6:01 AM, David Davis wrote: >> >> +1 from me. >> >> David >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:26 AM Dennis Kliban >> wrote: >> >>> No objections f

Re: [Pulp-dev] pulp_gem reached beta status

That is great! I know several users who have asked us about gem support in the past. Thank you for contributing this. To get it on that list, could you send a PR adding it to this table [2]? We can merge it once it's opened. [2]: https://github.com/pulp/pulpproject.org/blob/gh-pages/pulp-3-plugin

[Pulp-dev] pulp_gem reached beta status

Hi all, i think it is time to call it a beta now, so i cordially ask you to include pulp_gem on the plugin list [0]. I uploaded version 0.0.1b1 to pypi a minute ago [1], so it should be installable via pip. Let me know if you think there's anything wrong/missing. Thank you all! Matthias [0] https

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to remove 'notes' fields from the Pulp 3 RC

+1. Ty for bringing this up @dalley On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:47 AM Jeff Ortel wrote: > no objection > > On 12/3/18 10:32 PM, Daniel Alley wrote: > > *Background:* > > "Notes" are a generic key value store where data can be attached to > repositories and content and publications and so forth. T

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to remove 'notes' fields from the Pulp 3 RC

Issue filed and added to sprint https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4222 On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 9:14 AM Dennis Kliban wrote: > +1 to removing it > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:34 AM Austin Macdonald > wrote: > >> +1, nice catch Daniel. >> >> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018, 7:14 AM David Davis > >>> Big +1. This see

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to remove 'notes' fields from the Pulp 3 RC

no objection On 12/3/18 10:32 PM, Daniel Alley wrote: *Background:* "Notes" are a generic key value store where data can be attached to repositories and content and publications and so forth.  The eventual plan is to use this to enable adding tags to those sorts of objects, which is importan

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to remove 'notes' fields from the Pulp 3 RC

+1 to removing it On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:34 AM Austin Macdonald wrote: > +1, nice catch Daniel. > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018, 7:14 AM David Davis >> Big +1. This seems like something we could add later on at any time when >> we need it. Hopefully we can get Katello and our users involved in sussin

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to remove 'notes' fields from the Pulp 3 RC

+1, nice catch Daniel. On Tue, Dec 4, 2018, 7:14 AM David Davis Big +1. This seems like something we could add later on at any time when > we need it. Hopefully we can get Katello and our users involved in sussing > out the requirements for how this field should work too. > > David > > > On Mon,

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to remove 'notes' fields from the Pulp 3 RC

Big +1. This seems like something we could add later on at any time when we need it. Hopefully we can get Katello and our users involved in sussing out the requirements for how this field should work too. David On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 11:34 PM Daniel Alley wrote: > *Background:* > > "Notes" are