Re: [Pulp-dev] Pulp3 performance results

It's been a long week of meetings. I just realized that the attachments won't be available to all on this list and I should have re-directed this to the internal list for now. On the other hand, the upside is that folks know we are doing these types of tests and I'll check if we can put together a

[Pulp-dev] Pulp3 performance results

Hello Team, The perf & scale team has come up with performance results of pulp3 based upon some test cases. I would like to share with all of you. *How we tested* - Installed the pulp3 on one CentOS (7.5) system and tested using these scripts

[Pulp-dev] RPM plugin meeting notes

Pulp 2: - Multi-repo copy update (dalley) - PRs ready for review - https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1420/ - https://github.com/pulp/pulp/pull/3947 - Docs changes remain - Still no smash tests, will work with QE on this, they

Re: [Pulp-dev] artifact stages adjustment or any other solution?

During the pulp_rpm meeting today @ttereshc identified that the on-demand content concern I brought up is not an issue because modulemd is a metadata file so it will always be downloaded and its Artifact saved regardless of the on-demand policy. So that's a non-issue. :) @mdellweg I will think mor

Re: [Pulp-dev] artifact stages adjustment or any other solution?

I am not entirely sure, whether it is the same kind of problem, but in [0] there is an example of a stage that adds a declarative artifact in the middle of the pipeline. [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulp_deb/blob/master/pulp_deb/app/tasks/synchronizing.py#L204 On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:42:33 -0400 Br

Re: [Pulp-dev] artifact stages adjustment or any other solution?

I agree Austin's suggestion of a mechanism like that sounds good. Can a more detailed description be written in Redmine and sent to the list? This change is in Stages API which has such broad impact that I'd feel most comfortable if we could get to that level of detail together somehow. The Stages

Re: [Pulp-dev] artifact stages adjustment or any other solution?

Austin, thank you. Your option is more explicit, so it's probably better. Tanya On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 6:38 PM Austin Macdonald wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:34 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko > wrote: > >> Bump. >> >> Please provide feedback if you have any. >> I'll start working on the PR