Re: [Pulp-dev] python-nectar 1.6.2 needed

2020-09-17 Thread Evgeni Golov
and packaging is in https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/114 the result is now available in the 2.21 stage repo, including the fresh nectar from earlier this week. I kicked off https://pulp-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/pulp-2.21-dev-rhel7/ and https://pulp-jenkins.rhev-ci-

Re: [Pulp-dev] python-nectar 1.6.2 needed

2020-09-17 Thread Evgeni Golov
Yes I will ;-) pick PR for 3.2-release is up at https://github.com/pulp/pulp_docker/pull/462 On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 4:56 PM Ina Panova wrote: > > Hi Evgeni, > today it has been identified that pulp_docker also needs a release due to > this related commit > https://github.com/pulp/pulp_docker/

Re: [Pulp-dev] Unblocking SigningService hash check PR

2020-09-17 Thread Quirin Pamp
The result of our discussion was to pursue a (somewhat) different approach to the one from the PR. It therefore makes sense to close the PR. I am a bit fuzzy on what the next steps were (adding a public key to the SigningService base class?), but I suppose I will just have to re-watch the meet