not others. I'll let you know once I'm done testing.
>>>>
>>>> Lai
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 6:41 AM Ina Panova wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> Still waiting on the test results.
Moin,
is there a verdict about the builds?
Evgeni
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 2:43 PM Evgeni Golov wrote:
>
> and packaging is in https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/114
>
> the result is now available in the 2.21 stage repo, including the
> fresh nectar from earlier t
gt; patches fix the original issue we can push to stable.
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ina Panova
>> Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>>
>> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>> go instead where there is no pa
I've released nectar 1.6.2 RPMs to
https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/pulp/pulp/testing/automation/2-master/stage/
Do you want to do any testing, or should I push the same RPMs directly
to the stable 2.21 repo too (or first to staging 2.21)?
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:18 PM Evgeni Golov wrote
tiana Tereshchenko
> wrote:
>>
>> It's not intentional, let me fix it.
>>
>> Tanya
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:46 AM Evgeni Golov wrote:
>>>
>>> Ohai,
>>>
>>> in
>>> https://github.com/pulp/pulp-2to3-migratio
intentional? Or should it be >=3.4,<3.5 (or ~= 3.4)?
If it's intentional, we'll have to downgrade pulpcore for Katello :(
Evgeni
--
Beste Grüße/Kind regards,
Evgeni Golov
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat GmbH
r we made the release
>>> process automated. I asked multiple times if they were interested and got
>>> essentially no response.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/openSUSE/libsolv/issues/228
>>>
>>> + some discussion on IRC
>>>
>>> Feb 24 10:
you shouldn't do that and instead either persuade (and help!) the real
upstreams to publish their stuff to PyPI or bite the bullet and accept
that pip is not able to install everything needed for a working
environment.
Thanks!
Evgeni
--
Beste Grüße/Kind regards,
Evgeni Golov
Senior Software Engin
