;
>> From: pulp-dev-boun...@redhat.com on
>> behalf of David Davis
>> Sent: 23 August 2021 15:30
>> To: Melanie Corr
>> Cc: pulp-list; Pulp Development List
>> Subject: Re: [Pulp-dev] [Pulp-list] Github Discussions
>&
_
> From: pulp-dev-boun...@redhat.com on behalf
> of David Davis
> Sent: 23 August 2021 15:30
> To: Melanie Corr
> Cc: pulp-list; Pulp Development List
> Subject: Re: [Pulp-dev] [Pulp-list] Github Discussions
>
> If no one objects, I will be
...@redhat.com on behalf of
David Davis
Sent: 23 August 2021 15:30
To: Melanie Corr
Cc: pulp-list; Pulp Development List
Subject: Re: [Pulp-dev] [Pulp-list] Github Discussions
If no one objects, I will be retiring Pulp's Github Discussions by September
1st. It seems like the options we are consid
If no one objects, I will be retiring Pulp's Github Discussions by
September 1st. It seems like the options we are considering going forward
are either staying on the mailing lists or moving to Discourse.
If you need something migrated over to Discourse from Github Discussions,
please let me know.
Hi all,
Based on your feedback, we now have a Pulp Community Discourse:
https://discourse.pulpproject.org/
This is still a continuation of our evaluation of whether to move away from
the mailing list as a primary communication method. We need you to tell us
if this is helpful.
We will wrap up an
Having been an admin on the Foreman Community Discourse for over a year, I
am +1 to a using Discourse for community conversations.
Greg Sutcliffe has data to prove the increase in community engagement after
the move.
Ar Aoine 18 Meith 2021 ag 16:33, scríobh Daniel Alley :
> And Matrix integration
And Matrix integration.
https://meta.discourse.org/t/chatroom-integration-plugin-discourse-chat-integration/66522
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 1:11 PM David Davis wrote:
> I was rather surprised but Discourse did approve us for a free plan. The
> instance has been set up at https://pulp.discourse.gr
I was rather surprised but Discourse did approve us for a free plan. The
instance has been set up at https://pulp.discourse.group/. Feel free to try
it out and experiment with it.
However, the main limitation I see is the 50k pageviews per month limit.
For reference, community.theforeman.org gets
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 7:21 PM David Davis wrote:
>
> One of the main reasons we wanted to move off mailing lists is that signing
> up is inconvenient for users that may just want to ask a single question. But
> I agree that Github Discussions is not so great if users want to periodically
> mo
One of the main reasons we wanted to move off mailing lists is that signing
up is inconvenient for users that may just want to ask a single question.
But I agree that Github Discussions is not so great if users want to
periodically monitor news and discussions for a project like Pulp. I wonder
perh
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, at 3:12 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:59 AM David Davis wrote:
> >
> > Yesterday at open floor, we discussed decommissioning pulp-dev list in
> > favor of of using Github Discussions[0] for developer discussions.
> >
> > If there are no objections, I pla
>
> It's pretty hard to do filtering of GitHub mail...
I can't disagree with that.
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 4:35 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Well, let's see if that works. Another concern I have is about
> filtering stuff from discussions in Gmail. It's pretty hard to do
> filtering of GitHub mail..
If you watch the repo, you should be able to get notifications when there's
new activity?
David
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 3:13 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:59 AM David Davis
> wrote:
> >
> > Yesterday at open floor, we discussed decommissioning pulp-dev list in
> favor of o
Well, let's see if that works. Another concern I have is about
filtering stuff from discussions in Gmail. It's pretty hard to do
filtering of GitHub mail...
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 4:29 PM David Davis wrote:
>
> If you watch the repo, you should be able to get notifications when there's
> new ac
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:59 AM David Davis wrote:
>
> Yesterday at open floor, we discussed decommissioning pulp-dev list in favor
> of of using Github Discussions[0] for developer discussions.
>
> If there are no objections, I plan to decommission the pulp-dev list next
> week.
>
> [0] https:
There are a few places in the docs where we reference pulp-dev@ , that
should be changed as part of/before we pull the plug.
contributing/index.rst: * through the developer mailing list (``
pulp-dev@redhat.com``)
plugins/plugin-writer/concepts/index.rst:maintainers either through the
developer ma
Yesterday at open floor, we discussed decommissioning pulp-dev list in
favor of of using Github Discussions[0] for developer discussions.
If there are no objections, I plan to decommission the pulp-dev list next
week.
[0] https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions
David
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021
I did this also for the pulpcore meeting:
https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions/8
My format was a little different, but the same idea.
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:13 AM Grant Gainey wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:40 AM David Davis wrote:
>
>> Based on feedback, I've moved discussions
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:40 AM David Davis wrote:
> Based on feedback, I've moved discussions to its own repo:
> https://github.com/pulp/community/discussions.
>
Brillliant!
One discovery I made this week - for 'Meetings' threads that exist to have
meeting-minutes posted, the first entry should
19 matches
Mail list logo
