On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 6:00 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko
wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> I agree with the problems identified.
> I'm concerned that the same plugins have a different set of features
> in Pulp 2 and Pulp 3, e.g, pulp_rpm. Having it just marked as compatible
> with both Pulp 2 and Pulp 3 might c
Thanks, Tanya.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:01 AM Tatiana Tereshchenko
wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> I agree with the problems identified.
> I'm concerned that the same plugins have a different set of features
> in Pulp 2 and Pulp 3, e.g, pulp_rpm. Having it just marked as compatible
> with both Pulp 2 a
Hi Brian,
I agree with the problems identified.
I'm concerned that the same plugins have a different set of features
in Pulp 2 and Pulp 3, e.g, pulp_rpm. Having it just marked as compatible
with both Pulp 2 and Pulp 3 might create an assumption that the same
features are available for both Pulp 2
Melanie,
I'm sending via pulp-dev for more visibility, but I wanted to see what you
think specifically. Recently a user gave us feedback via an issue on Pulp 3
pain points for usage [0]. A lot of it is code and docs, and we're working
to address those, but the last bullet says:
"On the project pa
