Nope.
On 09/13/2016 12:58 PM, Austin Macdonald wrote:
> Anyone see any value in keeping these?
>
> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/72
> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/75
> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/76
> https://pulp.plan.io/issues/79
>
> ___
> Pulp-dev mail
On 09/13/2016 03:07 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> Those all look fine to close WONTFIX. I believe issue #79 should be
> CLOSED - CURRENT RELEASE
That sounds good to me!
--
Jeremy Cline
XMPP: jer...@jcline.org
IRC: jcline
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Those all look fine to close WONTFIX. I believe issue #79 should be
CLOSED - CURRENT RELEASE
On 09/13/2016 01:58 PM, Austin Macdonald wrote:
Anyone see any value in keeping these?
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/72
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/75
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/76
https://pulp.plan.io/
Anyone see any value in keeping these?
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/72
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/75
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/76
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/79
___
Pulp-dev mailing list
Pulp-dev@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp