Re: [Pulp-dev] PUP-1 template missing field

2018-08-29 Thread David Davis
This has been merged. Thank you to those that voted. David On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 1:40 PM Dennis Kliban wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Dana Walker wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Dana Walker >> >> Associate Software Engineer >> >> Red Hat >> >> >>

Re: [Pulp-dev] PUP-1 template missing field

2018-08-14 Thread Dennis Kliban
+1 On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Dana Walker wrote: > +1 > > Dana Walker > > Associate Software Engineer > > Red Hat > > > > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Brian Bouterse > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Alley w

Re: [Pulp-dev] PUP-1 template missing field

2018-08-14 Thread Dana Walker
+1 Dana Walker Associate Software Engineer Red Hat On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Brian Bouterse wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Alley wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:35 PM, David Davis >> wrote: >> >>>

Re: [Pulp-dev] PUP-1 template missing field

2018-08-13 Thread Brian Bouterse
+1 On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Daniel Alley wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:35 PM, David Davis > wrote: > >> I am making a small tweak to PUP-1 to include version in the template. I >> forgot to do so when I added the revision process to PUP-1. >> >> https://github.com/pulp/pups/

Re: [Pulp-dev] PUP-1 template missing field

2018-08-13 Thread Daniel Alley
+1 On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:35 PM, David Davis wrote: > I am making a small tweak to PUP-1 to include version in the template. I > forgot to do so when I added the revision process to PUP-1. > > https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/13 > > Please vote by August 25, 2018. Again the options are: > >

[Pulp-dev] PUP-1 template missing field

2018-08-13 Thread David Davis
I am making a small tweak to PUP-1 to include version in the template. I forgot to do so when I added the revision process to PUP-1. https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/13 Please vote by August 25, 2018. Again the options are: +1: "Will benefit the project and should definitely be adopted." +0: "M