Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to drop support of Python 3.5 for Pulp 3

Excellent! I closed mine. @dalley had it at ASSIGNED so maybe he'll do 3984 instead. On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Simon Baatz wrote: > fyi, I had already created #3984 [0] for the Python 3.5 > removal/Python 3.6+ requirement. > > And: Thanks to you all for supporting this proposal! > > > [0]

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to drop support of Python 3.5 for Pulp 3

fyi, I had already created #3984 [0] for the Python 3.5 removal/Python 3.6+ requirement. And: Thanks to you all for supporting this proposal! [0] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3984 On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 02:54:23PM -0400, Brian Bouterse wrote: >Here are the two stories for this work. I think

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to drop support of Python 3.5 for Pulp 3

Here are the two stories for this work. I think we should add them to the sprint. They weren't written this morning for sprint planning unfortunately. https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4015 https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4016 On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Tatiana Tereshchenko wrote: > Big +1 > > Tan

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to drop support of Python 3.5 for Pulp 3

Big +1 Tanya On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 4:50 PM, David Davis wrote: > +1 > > David > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:35 AM Jeff Ortel wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On 09/07/2018 01:09 AM, Simon Baatz wrote: >> > I had a discussion on IRC with Brian yesterday which led to the >> > question whether we can dr

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to drop support of Python 3.5 for Pulp 3

+1 David On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 10:35 AM Jeff Ortel wrote: > +1 > > On 09/07/2018 01:09 AM, Simon Baatz wrote: > > I had a discussion on IRC with Brian yesterday which led to the > > question whether we can drop support for Python 3.5. I think there are > > good reasons for this, see the rati

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to drop support of Python 3.5 for Pulp 3

+1 On 09/07/2018 01:09 AM, Simon Baatz wrote: I had a discussion on IRC with Brian yesterday which led to the question whether we can drop support for Python 3.5. I think there are good reasons for this, see the rationale below. Brian proposed to initiate a vote on this topic (and find out whet

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to drop support of Python 3.5 for Pulp 3

Ok, cool, thanks for the clarification. Dana Walker Associate Software Engineer Red Hat On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Dennis Kliban wrote: > I am +1 on this also. > > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Dana Walker wrote: > >> This sounds like

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to drop support of Python 3.5 for Pulp 3

I am +1 on this also. On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 10:29 AM, Dana Walker wrote: > This sounds like a great idea. +1 > > My only hesitation would be if this hurts a significant portion of users. > Do we know how many users use older versions of Ubuntu or Debian that this > would impact? Any other gr

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to drop support of Python 3.5 for Pulp 3

Seems reasonable to me. Even without python 3.6 in the official repositories for Debian and trusty Ubuntu, it isn't very difficult to install 3.6 with tools like anaconda and pyenv. From my perspective, dropping 3.5 would introduce short term inconvenience for those systems, and simplify our long t

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to drop support of Python 3.5 for Pulp 3

This sounds like a great idea. +1 My only hesitation would be if this hurts a significant portion of users. Do we know how many users use older versions of Ubuntu or Debian that this would impact? Any other groups we might not have considered yet? Dana Walker Associate Software Engineer Red H

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to drop support of Python 3.5 for Pulp 3

I'm also +1 on this for the various reasons. Even with the portability downsides. Also, practically speaking, the batch code is legit, and it will benfit the stages code a lot. On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 8:17 AM, Daniel Alley wrote: > Personally, +1. I ran into this issue myself and it was infuriat

Re: [Pulp-dev] Proposal to drop support of Python 3.5 for Pulp 3

Personally, +1. I ran into this issue myself and it was infuriating to deal with. dict objects preserve insertion-order (officially declared part of > the language with Python 3.7). Eliminates a source of subtle > "works on 3.6, sometimes works on 3.5" bugs. > Just to expand on this though:

[Pulp-dev] Proposal to drop support of Python 3.5 for Pulp 3

I had a discussion on IRC with Brian yesterday which led to the question whether we can drop support for Python 3.5. I think there are good reasons for this, see the rationale below. Brian proposed to initiate a vote on this topic (and find out whether this "community thing" works :-) ). Please s