Re: [Pulp-dev] Reconsidering PUP-3

Just a quick update: voting on PUP-3 ended Monday Oct 8th. PUP-3 was approved with nine +1 votes. I think the next step is to work on a transition plan. If you’d like to be involved with this, please let me know. More updates next week. David On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM,

Re: [Pulp-dev] Reconsidering PUP-3

+1 ___ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Reconsidering PUP-3

+1 ___ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Re: [Pulp-dev] Reconsidering PUP-3

+1 On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote: > +1 > > I believe the cherry picking approach will avoid merge-forward problems > we've experienced, allow for less friction during community contribution, > and create a more stable project overall. > > On Fri,

Re: [Pulp-dev] Reconsidering PUP-3

+1 On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:17 AM, David Davis wrote: > I went back and looked at PUP-3 and it does lay out some of the items > @pcreech mentions although at a higher, more general level. I’ll leave the > document as is unless someone disagrees. > > With that in mind,

Re: [Pulp-dev] Reconsidering PUP-3

I went back and looked at PUP-3 and it does lay out some of the items @pcreech mentions although at a higher, more general level. I’ll leave the document as is unless someone disagrees. With that in mind, let's go ahead and vote on PUP-3. We’ll end the voting on October 8th which is about 10 days

Re: [Pulp-dev] Reconsidering PUP-3

Thanks @pcreech for all the comments. I also believe that switching to a cherry-picking model will provide many benefits. As a general FYI, the way PUP-3 is written, it allows us to adopt it (assuming it passes at vote) and then figure out how to roll it out later in coordination w/ release

Re: [Pulp-dev] Reconsidering PUP-3

Since I was one of the early voices against cherrypicking during the initial vote, I figured I'd send this e-mail along with some points that have helped me be in favor of cherry picking before voting starts. In taking over the release engineering process, I have gained some perspective on our

Re: [Pulp-dev] Reconsidering PUP-3

I’d like to extend the discussion (and put off voting) for another week since we’re wrapping up the alpha release of Pulp 3 this week. Any objections? If not, then we’ll start voting on September 26th. David On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:23 PM, David Davis wrote: >

[Pulp-dev] Reconsidering PUP-3

Previously we had a vote on the proposal to change our git workflow mainly by using cherry-picks instead of merging changes forward. This proposal, PUP-3, can be viewed here: https://github.com/daviddavis/pups/blob/pup3/pup-0003.md When we had the vote though, it became clear that there was some