Thanks for the replies so far. Sounds like parent -> child might be the
best nomenclature that has been used previously and fits our style. In our
case there is only one Pulp that is master of the universe and every other
Pulp is simply a copy of pieces of the master errr parent but never
contains
We also have called it "Pulp to Pulp sync" informally.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:23 PM, David Davis wrote:
> So syncing from one Pulp server to another Pulp server is usually called
> 'natural syncing'. See [0][1].
>
> AFAIK, there is no official concept of master/nodes/etc in Pulp anymore
> sin
So syncing from one Pulp server to another Pulp server is usually called
'natural syncing'. See [0][1].
AFAIK, there is no official concept of master/nodes/etc in Pulp anymore
since in the case of natural syncing, there’s nothing special about either
instance of Pulp. We have used the terms ‘paren
Howdy,
The simple question is there any nomenclature used when referring to a Pulp
server and another Pulp server that syncs from the previous one?
The background behind this question is as follows. Pulp at a time had the
concept of masters and nodes. With the removal of the official node-concept
