Re: [Pulp-dev] To integrate Fus or not to....

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 7:11 PM Jeff Ortel wrote: > > > On 10/12/2018 11:37 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 5:17 PM Jeff Ortel wrote: > >> >> >> On 10/12/2018 09:53 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:59 PM Jeff Ortel wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On

Re: [Pulp-dev] To integrate Fus or not to....

On 10/12/2018 11:37 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote: On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 5:17 PM Jeff Ortel > wrote: On 10/12/2018 09:53 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote: On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:59 PM Jeff Ortel mailto:jor...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 10/10/2018 08:59 AM

Re: [Pulp-dev] To integrate Fus or not to....

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 5:17 PM Jeff Ortel wrote: > > > On 10/12/2018 09:53 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:59 PM Jeff Ortel wrote: > >> >> >> On 10/10/2018 08:59 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote: >> >> ...that might be the question we should ask ourselves once again when it >>

Re: [Pulp-dev] To integrate Fus or not to....

On 10/12/2018 09:53 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote: On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 3:59 PM Jeff Ortel > wrote: On 10/10/2018 08:59 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote: ...that might be the question we should ask ourselves once again when it comes to recursive copying of units

Re: [Pulp-dev] To integrate Fus or not to....

On 10/10/2018 08:59 AM, Milan Kovacik wrote: ...that might be the question we should ask ourselves once again when it comes to recursive copying of units between repositories. I'd like to poll folks opinions about the possibilities that we may have when it comes to integrating third party so

Re: [Pulp-dev] To integrate Fus or not to....

Thanks David! On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 4:59 PM David Davis wrote: > One consideration is that whatever we do for Pulp 2, we’ll have to do > again in Pulp 3. For that reason, as ugly as it is, I am leaning toward > calling to Fus via a pipe. It seems the easiest, least amount of work, and > most r

Re: [Pulp-dev] To integrate Fus or not to....

One consideration is that whatever we do for Pulp 2, we’ll have to do again in Pulp 3. For that reason, as ugly as it is, I am leaning toward calling to Fus via a pipe. It seems the easiest, least amount of work, and most reusable. David On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:00 AM Milan Kovacik wrote: >

[Pulp-dev] To integrate Fus or not to....

...that might be the question we should ask ourselves once again when it comes to recursive copying of units between repositories. I'd like to poll folks opinions about the possibilities that we may have when it comes to integrating third party solvers in Pulp. My yesterday's chat with the #fedora