Re: [Pulp-dev] issue #3360 follow up

+1 @daviddavis, @dkliban, @jortel's plan. I've added a comment to the issue, https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3360#note-11 On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:25 PM, David Davis wrote: > After meeting with @dkliban and @jortel to discuss #3360, we came up with > an alternative proposal

Re: [Pulp-dev] issue #3360 follow up

After meeting with @dkliban and @jortel to discuss #3360, we came up with an alternative proposal that has some small tweaks. Basically, all three parameters (add_content, remove_content, and base_version) could be used together and the parameter for the repository version would be called

Re: [Pulp-dev] issue #3360 follow up

I like the name ‘mirror_repository_version’ unless someone has a better proposal. David On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Dennis Kliban wrote: > Earlier today several of us discussed issue 3360[0]. In our discussion we > concluded that it is valuable for users to be able to

[Pulp-dev] issue #3360 follow up

Earlier today several of us discussed issue 3360[0]. In our discussion we concluded that it is valuable for users to be able to create exact copies of repository versions within a repository and across different repositories. I have updated the issue to reflect what we discussed. We decided that