Hi All,
I am running pulp 2.4.3 in my Centos 6.5 Box. I have synced epel and Centos
Updates repository.
Please guide me on how to add a set of custom built RPM packages which is
on my local machine to be added to either of the two existing repos. To be
served to our internal users.
--
With Re
On 11/21/2014 04:05 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
On 11/21/2014 04:32 PM, Jeff Ortel wrote:
Although, I wonder if the 3.0 time frame would be more appropriate.
Thoughts?
I think we can reorganize the docs with any release if we want to. I
don't think that violates semantic versioning. I wouldn't w
On 11/21/2014 04:32 PM, Jeff Ortel wrote:
> Although, I wonder if the 3.0 time frame would be more appropriate.
> Thoughts?
I think we can reorganize the docs with any release if we want to. I
don't think that violates semantic versioning. I wouldn't want to do it
to the docs from an already relea
Although, I wonder if the 3.0 time frame would be more appropriate.
Thoughts?
On 11/21/2014 03:31 PM, Jeff Ortel wrote:
Seems reasonable to me.
On 11/21/2014 09:13 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
Any other opinions on this?
___
Pulp-list mailing list
Pul
Seems reasonable to me.
On 11/21/2014 09:13 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
Any other opinions on this?
___
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
___
Pulp
pulp-docker 0.2.1-1 and crane 0.2.2-1 have been tagged, and a new
"0.2-release" branch has been created for each project.
If you are doing work on pulp-docker or crane, you will most likely
still want to still use the master branch. Also, if you do commit to
0.2-release or need to create a 0.2-tes
On 11/21/2014 10:13 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
Any other opinions on this?
At the moment there is a lot of duplicated information at the moment and
also a lot if info is too deeply nested to be found intuitively, so this
might be a higher priority than I originally thought.
If nobody has any o
Any other opinions on this?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
On 11/21/2014 09:41 AM, Veiko Kukk wrote:
> On 21/11/14 16:21, Veiko Kukk wrote:
>> On 20/11/14 18:41, Paul Gonin wrote:
>>> Ok thanks.
>>> I actually searched in bugzilla but did not find this one.
>>>
>>> I am in the process to switch to 2.4 so it should not be an issue then.
>>> Not a big one
On 21/11/14 16:21, Veiko Kukk wrote:
On 20/11/14 18:41, Paul Gonin wrote:
Ok thanks.
I actually searched in bugzilla but did not find this one.
I am in the process to switch to 2.4 so it should not be an issue then.
Not a big one anyway.
Don't hurry, the error is still there.
Nov 21 14:11:27
I thought it was too, but then I upgraded to the python-nectar that is required
by Pulp 2.4 it went away for me. I am currently running python-nectar-1.3.1
Veiko, what version of python-nectar are you running?
-Brian
- Original Message -
> From: "Veiko Kukk"
> To: pulp-list@redhat.com
On 20/11/14 18:41, Paul Gonin wrote:
Ok thanks.
I actually searched in bugzilla but did not find this one.
I am in the process to switch to 2.4 so it should not be an issue then.
Not a big one anyway.
Don't hurry, the error is still there.
Nov 21 14:11:27 hostname pulp: nectar.downloaders.loc
12 matches
Mail list logo
