On 12/23/2014 03:49 PM, Chris Duryee wrote:
> Pulp 2.6.0 beta 1 is available at the usual beta locations.
>
> Happy testing!
>
This release does not include Fedora 21 builds. We plan on building for
Fedora 21 in the near future.
___
Pulp-list mailin
Pulp 2.6.0 beta 1 is available at the usual beta locations.
Happy testing!
___
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
On 12/22/2014 02:22 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> I have just published a release candidate for our upcoming 2.5.2
> release. It fixes this issue:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175818
We were hoping to release 2.5.2 soon, but it looks like we may not be
able to release it for a bit
I've discovered an important bug in our branch strategy that we need to
address! What is written below is incorrect, and it led to an issue
today. I have made a task to document the correct strategy[0], but in
the meantime I wanted to get the word out here.
The really important thing to note is th
heads up for developers,
I am creating 2.6-testing branches in pulp, pulp_rpm and pulp_puppet for
the eventual 2.6 beta.
If you are making changes that you'd like in 2.6 beta, please ensure
they land in this branch. Thanks!
___
Pulp-list mailing list
P
On 12/23/2014 11:33 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> If you are in the Raleigh-Durham, USA region on January 15th
Correction: the date is January 22. Thanks to mhrivnak for pointing this
out!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pulp-list
If you are in the Raleigh-Durham, USA region on January 15th, you might
be interested in attending a talk I will be giving at TriPython, the
local Python user group.
http://tripython.org/Members/cbc/jan-15-mtg
I will be presenting Pulp generally, as well as demonstrating the new
Python plugins th
