Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp 2.7.0 beta is available

Thanks Randy, the CDN/metadata errors aren't showing up right now, so maybe it was just a temporary fluke. I successfully synced right before the upgrade to 2.7, so I assumed the worse. :) In any case, I'll keep an eye on it for the next couple of days to make sure the error doesn't return. And

Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp 2.7.0 beta is available

- Original Message - > - Original Message - > > Webb, Reece wrote: > > > Thanks, I upgraded from 2.6.3. As I said in my last follow-up email, > > > recreating a repository allow it to successfully sync/publish. But now > > > I'm > > > running into two other issues... email notificat

Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp 2.7.0 beta is available

Dennis Kliban wrote: > I am actually filing this bug. I was able to reproduce it on my box. dkliban++! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pulp-list mailing list Pulp-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-l

Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp 2.7.0 beta is available

- Original Message - > Webb, Reece wrote: > > Thanks, I upgraded from 2.6.3. As I said in my last follow-up email, > > recreating a repository allow it to successfully sync/publish. But now I'm > > running into two other issues... email notification events don't work at > > all. I've also r

Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp 2.7.0 beta is available

Webb, Reece wrote: > Thanks, I upgraded from 2.6.3. As I said in my last follow-up email, > recreating a repository allow it to successfully sync/publish. But now I'm > running into two other issues... email notification events don't work at all. > I've also run into an error retrieving metadata

Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp 2.6.3 is available

Bradley Davis wrote: > Is there a link to the Release Notes? The documentation hasn't been > updated yet for 2.6.3 They do seem to be present when I look at them: http://pulp.readthedocs.org/en/latest/user-guide/release-notes/2.6.x.html#pulp-2-6-3 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital sig

Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp 2.6.3 is available

Is there a link to the Release Notes? The documentation hasn't been updated yet for 2.6.3 On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Dennis Kliban wrote: > Pulp 2.6.3 is available at it's usual location [0] > > - Dennis > > [0] https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/pulp/pulp/stable/2.6/ > > __

Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp 2.7.0 beta is available

Hi Randy, Thanks, I upgraded from 2.6.3. As I said in my last follow-up email, recreating a repository allow it to successfully sync/publish. But now I'm running into two other issues... email notification events don't work at all. I've also run into an error retrieving metadata on seemingly ra

Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp 2.7.0 beta is available

Webb, Reece wrote: > Sep 16 08:26:19 yummy pulp: celery.worker.job:ERROR: (1822-58784) Task > pulp.server.managers.repo.publish.publish[e325dd8a-3541-4f10-a5f0-80f6a51f8a19] > raised unexpected: TypeError("can't compare offset-naive and offset-aware > datetimes",) > Sep 16 08:26:19 yummy pulp: c

Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp 2.7.0 beta is available

If I delete and recreate the repository, sync/publish works. So I guess something isn't getting updated correctly? Reece On 9/16/15, 8:28 AM, "Webb, Reece" wrote: >I just upgraded from 2.6.3 on RHEL 7.1, using the upgrade instructions >provided in the release notes. I'm now unable to sync

Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp 2.7.0 beta is available

I just upgraded from 2.6.3 on RHEL 7.1, using the upgrade instructions provided in the release notes. I'm now unable to sync or publish. I tried running the sync with the "-v", but it says the option doesn't exist... # pulp-admin rpm repo sync run --repo-id rad-epel-7 +--