Re: [Pulp-list] How to Safely Test Your Data for 2.8 Upgradability

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Mohammed Zeeshan < mohammed.zee1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am using the 2.8 beta packages that you pointed to earlier in the irc, > but i will look into this post as well. > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Michael Hrivnak <m

Re: [Pulp-list] [Discuss] Pulp/crane as container repo for CentOS Container Pipeline

issues/5742 > > Michael > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Mohammed Zeeshan < > mohammed.zee1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am Mohammed Zeeshan Ahmed, part of Container Tooling Team at Redhat, >> working on the registry component of th

Re: [Pulp-list] How to Safely Test Your Data for 2.8 Upgradability

_ > Pulp-list mailing list > Pulp-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list > -- *Mohammed Zeeshan Ahmed, * B.E Computer Science Engineering Certified IT & Cloud Architect & RHCSA +919986458839 Bengaluru, India

[Pulp-list] [Discuss] Pulp/crane as container repo for CentOS Container Pipeline

Hi, I am Mohammed Zeeshan Ahmed, part of Container Tooling Team at Redhat, working on the registry component of the CentOS Container Pipeline. I have been trying to get pulp/crane to work for sometime now to get it to fit into the pipeline. I have setup pulp/crane on a single node (self signed

Re: [Pulp-list] Doubt

r the best way to get crane 1.2 into your environment. > > Michael > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Mohammed Zeeshan < > mohammed.zee1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Nope doesn't work, I ran docker daemon in debug mode, and here are the >> logs i got. I perso

Re: [Pulp-list] Doubt

k for you: > > docker pull dev-32-79.lon1.centos.org:5000/pulptest/busybox > > Michael > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Mohammed Zeeshan < > mohammed.zee1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have managed to successfully setup a pulp/crane setup in