[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] Make pulse build with clang again

2011-09-28 Thread Maarten Bosmans
This patch was sent to the list before, but was deemend to riscy pre-1.0. So now I'll resend. It does touch de same code as David fixed with 42bcb418aed SSE/MMX: Fix problem with highpitched noise on i386, but I leaves his solution intact, so it should be safe. The problem this patch is trying

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] Make pulse build with clang again

2011-09-28 Thread Maarten Bosmans
The casts are not supported there. --- src/pulsecore/svolume_mmx.c |4 ++-- src/pulsecore/svolume_sse.c |4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/pulsecore/svolume_mmx.c b/src/pulsecore/svolume_mmx.c index ae2cf05..87d29e8 100644 ---

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] Make pulse build with clang again

2011-09-28 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 09:50 +0200, Maarten Bosmans wrote: This patch was sent to the list before, but was deemend to riscy pre-1.0. So now I'll resend. It does touch de same code as David fixed with 42bcb418aed SSE/MMX: Fix problem with highpitched noise on i386, but I leaves his solution

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] Make pulse build with clang again

2011-09-28 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Arun Raghavan at 28/09/11 09:08 did gyre and gimble: On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 09:50 +0200, Maarten Bosmans wrote: This patch was sent to the list before, but was deemend to riscy pre-1.0. So now I'll resend. It does touch de same code as David fixed with 42bcb418aed SSE/MMX:

[pulseaudio-discuss] Switching resamplers

2011-09-28 Thread Arun Raghavan
Hey folks, We've seen discussions a number of times on IRC about this, and now that 1.0's out the door, this might be a good time to consider this. The current default resampler is speex-float-3, which is on lower-end on highly loaded systems can be problematic (cause an underrun flood, f.ex.).

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-09-28 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 10:02 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: Hi Taylor, [ I've CC'ed a couple other potentially interested parties ] 'Twas brillig, and Taylor Hutt at 27/09/11 21:56 did gyre and gimble: Hello folks, I am indeed the one doing the majority of the work on the ADHD system at

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-09-28 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 12:02 +0300, Colin Guthrie wrote: We've also looked at UCM and decided that it wasn't right for our purposes, at least in the present state. FWIF PA will also support UCM in the near-ish future. In either case, if you need UCM-like features, I'd strongly advise you

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Switching resamplers

2011-09-28 Thread David Henningsson
On 09/28/2011 11:20 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote: Hey folks, We've seen discussions a number of times on IRC about this, and now that 1.0's out the door, this might be a good time to consider this. The current default resampler is speex-float-3, which is on lower-end on highly loaded systems can be

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC] [PATCH 0/1] VLC pass-through to PulseAudio

2011-09-28 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Rémi Denis-Courmont at 27/09/11 18:49 did gyre and gimble: Hello all, The following patch makes VLC negotiates S/PDIF pass-through with PulseAudio for A/52 and DTS audio tracks. This requires PulseAudio client library version 1.0.0 (or later) to compile, and a

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-09-28 Thread Taylor Hutt
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:02:49AM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Taylor Hutt at 27/09/11 21:56 did gyre and gimble: Hello folks, snip Since we have decided not to use Pulse,

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Google ChromeOS reinventing the wheel, ignoring PulseAudio

2011-09-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:29:03AM -0700, Taylor Hutt wrote: In this case, I am part of a team working to make a shipping product, and there are time constraints which do not afford the time necessary to do that, _and_ to make forward progress to get the sound system working across a

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] Make pulse build with clang again

2011-09-28 Thread Maarten Bosmans
2011/9/28 Maarten Bosmans mkbosm...@gmail.com: 2011/9/28 Arun Raghavan arun.ragha...@collabora.co.uk: On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 09:50 +0200, Maarten Bosmans wrote: This patch was sent to the list before, but was deemend to riscy pre-1.0. So now I'll resend. It does touch de same code as David

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] PulseAudio 1.0

2011-09-28 Thread Luke Yelavich
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 07:37:06PM EST, Colin Guthrie wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Yup, that's right it's 1.0 time at last. So this has been a long time coming, but finally it's out there! Thanks to everybody for putting this release together. 1.0 is now in

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [gentoo-user] PulseAudio 1.0-r1 + Skype == Garbled output sound

2011-09-28 Thread Spidey / Claudio
I haven't tried the masked version, but I follow the PA maillist and haven't seen anything like that. I'm forwarding this message to them, let's see what they say about it. I'll be sure to replicate their messages here in the future. Claudio Roberto França Pereira (a.k.a. Spidey) hardMOB -

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [gentoo-user] PulseAudio 1.0-r1 + Skype == Garbled output sound

2011-09-28 Thread Spidey / Claudio
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 00:44, Arun Raghavan arun.ragha...@collabora.co.uk wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 00:20 -0300, Spidey / Claudio wrote: I haven't tried the masked version, but I follow the PA maillist and haven't seen anything like that. I'm forwarding this message to them, let's see what