that were forgotten in the previous peaks resampler commits.
---
src/pulsecore/resampler.c | 18 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/pulsecore/resampler.c b/src/pulsecore/resampler.c
index dda6a2f..3cee06f 100644
--- a/src/pulsecore/resampler.c
2011/11/27 Colin Guthrie :
> 'Twas brillig, and Maarten Bosmans at 02/11/11 20:54 did gyre and gimble:
>> This is mainly achieved by special-casing the common 1ch float case,
>> which is used by applications such as pavucontrol.
>
> OK, I pushed this and the previous patch too.
>
> I didn't check t
'Twas brillig, and Maarten Bosmans at 28/11/11 09:36 did gyre and gimble:
> that were forgotten in the previous peaks resampler commits.
Damn, sorry, thought I'd gotten them all :( My mailbox is still in a
mess after they were all suddenly marked as unread due to Thunderbird
generally cocking up.
'Twas brillig, and Maarten Bosmans at 28/11/11 09:45 did gyre and gimble:
> 2011/11/27 Colin Guthrie :
>> 'Twas brillig, and Maarten Bosmans at 02/11/11 20:54 did gyre and gimble:
>>> This is mainly achieved by special-casing the common 1ch float case,
>>> which is used by applications such as pavu
'Twas brillig, and Arun Raghavan at 14/11/11 05:28 did gyre and gimble:
> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 21:54 +0100, Maarten Bosmans wrote:
>> As it isn't used anymore.
>> Also, some minor cleanup.
> Please break up patches into related changes only. I know that it's a
> lot of small changes, but this sor
Hi,
I apologize for the slow reaction.
> I liked the "my idea was that we would use quite static priority lists
> what would change only if you get an external event" part, but the "like
> incoming call" example ruined it :) Why should an incoming call affect
> any routing priority lists? When an
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 16:07 +0200, Janos Kovacs wrote:
> Voice guided navigation should never be routed to the earpiece (the
> built-in mono speaker) because if you would listen you would not able
> to see the map.
And that's how I use navigation when I'm biking.
Xav
___
2011/11/28 Colin Guthrie :
> 'Twas brillig, and Arun Raghavan at 14/11/11 05:28 did gyre and gimble:
>> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 21:54 +0100, Maarten Bosmans wrote:
>>> As it isn't used anymore.
>>> Also, some minor cleanup.
>
>> Please break up patches into related changes only. I know that it's a
>>
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 16:07 +0200, Janos Kovacs wrote:
> > I liked the "my idea was that we would use quite static priority lists
> > what would change only if you get an external event" part, but the "like
> > incoming call" example ruined it :) Why should an incoming call affect
> > any routing p
Hi,
>> In some cases we might have multiple zones, e.g a desktop PC
>> were in one room and a stereo amplifier would be in another
>> connected via S/PDIF. Say you want to do the usual stuff and
>> see youtube videos in one room, while playing out music to the
>> other room.
> Overall I think i
echo-cancel test program: fix memory leak
memory for pa_echo_canceller is allocated in init_common() a second time,
hence the allocated memory in main() is leaked
diff --git a/src/modules/echo-cancel/module-echo-cancel.c
b/src/modules/echo-cancel/module-echo-cancel.c
index 1fad12a..8bf6670
On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 16:14 +0100, Peter Meerwald wrote:
> echo-cancel test program: fix memory leak
>
> memory for pa_echo_canceller is allocated in init_common() a second time,
> hence the allocated memory in main() is leaked
Pulled to my tree, thanks!
-- Arun
12 matches
Mail list logo
