Hello,
I have submitted v3 of my ARM NEON patches July 24
(http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2012-July/014226.html)
but not received any feedback
any comment on this?
thanks, regards, p.
--
Peter Meerwald
+43-664-218 (mobile)
I was hoping this would improve bootup speed, but it doesn't seem
to do so here, at least not much. But at least it reduces the logs
a little.
Signed-off-by: David Henningsson david.hennings...@canonical.com
---
src/modules/alsa/alsa-mixer.c | 43 +
1
I was hoping this would improve bootup speed, but it doesn't seem
to do so here, at least not much. But at least it reduces the logs
a little.
Signed-off-by: David Henningsson david.hennings...@canonical.com
---
Please ignore the just sent v3. It was identical to v2, sorry.
On 09/25/2012 06:46 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 17:02 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
On 09/24/2012 03:33 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
Ok, I don't have a problem with this example. But the code in your patch
has different structure: instead of a simple match_found() call, the
If there is no silence memblock and no data, pa_memblockq_peek can
return NULL. In this case, do not crash on an assertion in
pa_memblock_acquire, but instead return a proper error to the client.
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058200
Signed-off-by: David Henningsson
