Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] RFC: pa_database to adopt hdf5?

2013-06-24 Thread Ian Malone
On 25 June 2013 04:49, Jason Newton wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Tanu Kaskinen > The data stored within HDF5 files is structured and the metadata makes > the files self-describing of their contents. This allows external > programs such as the HDF File viewer, matlab, and pytables to

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] doc: Update LICENSE to reflect optional libpulse dep on libdbus

2013-06-24 Thread David Henningsson
Hmm, are there optional dependencies to libdbus that cause it to become GPL, or why would anyone choose GPL for libdbus? Also "demoted to GPL" sounds like we have an opinion about GPL (it sound like we think LGPL being of a higher rank than GPL). On 06/25/2013 05:50 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote:

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Welcome to the "pulseaudio-discuss" mailing list

2013-06-24 Thread GUO LI
Thanks Ansis, at least now I am happy I am not alone, LOL. On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Ansis Māliņš wrote: > I tried setting it up some time ago, and it just doesn't work. At all. And > I haven't been able to find any accounts of people getting it to work. > > __

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Krakora
Hi Peter, If I convert all four files, which sent you, to 48K then they all play fine via PulseAudio 4.0 (no motor boating). The frequency spectrum of the 300Hz tone at 44.1K looked a lot different from the 300Hz tone generated by Audacity at 44.1K. I agree that the tone is not perfect. However

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] doc: Update LICENSE to reflect optional libpulse dep on libdbus

2013-06-24 Thread Arun Raghavan
--- LICENSE | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/LICENSE b/LICENSE index cd5e42f..80fc08c 100644 --- a/LICENSE +++ b/LICENSE @@ -13,6 +13,13 @@ Since the PulseAudio daemon, tests, various utilities/helpers and the modules link to libpulsecore and/or the afore mentioned opti

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] RFC: pa_database to adopt hdf5?

2013-06-24 Thread Jason Newton
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > > According to [1], libhdf5 installed size is multiple megabytes, so any > disk space savings would be negated by the necessity to install the new > library. > > [1] http://packages.debian.org/jessie/libhdf5-7 You definitely have a point

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Krakora
Hi Peter, Thanks, I suspect the resampling as well. I will take a look at the wave file with audacity and generate a pure 300 Hz tone. Thank you for your time. Best Regards, Rob On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Peter Meerwald wrote: > > > I just provided the files to you via YouSendIt. Yo

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Peter Meerwald
> I just provided the files to you via YouSendIt. You should be receiving an > e-mail with a link to them. Thanks in advance for your help. the mysterious 300HZ.wav is not a pure 300Hz tone; it plays distorted (on ALSA and PA) because the signal is distorted when you look at it in Audacity (An

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Krakora
Hi Peter, I just provided the files to you via YouSendIt. You should be receiving an e-mail with a link to them. Thanks in advance for your help. Best Regards, Rob On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Robert Krakora < rob.krak...@messagenetsystems.com> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Yes, I can. There

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Krakora
Hi Peter, Yes, I can. There are four tones total all at 44.1K. Give me a few... Sorry for my rambling e-mails... Best Regards, Rob On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Peter Meerwald wrote: > > > If I play 300HZ.wav sampled at 44.1K with straight ALSA 1.0.25 it sounds > > just fine. > > can y

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Krakora
If I convert 300HZ.wav to 48K and play with PulseAudio 4.0, it sounds fine. If 44.1K motorboats with PulseAudio 4.0 should it not also motorboat with straight ALSA 1.0.25? On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Robert Krakora < rob.krak...@messagenetsystems.com> wrote: > If I play 300HZ.wav sampled a

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Peter Meerwald
> If I play 300HZ.wav sampled at 44.1K with straight ALSA 1.0.25 it sounds > just fine. can you make the file(s) available somewhere? thanks, p. -- Peter Meerwald +43-664-218 (mobile) ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Krakora
If I play 300HZ.wav sampled at 44.1K with straight ALSA 1.0.25 it sounds just fine. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Robert Krakora < rob.krak...@messagenetsystems.com> wrote: > OK, I took the 300HZ.wav file and retested locally with Asterisk 11.4 out > of the equation. It is sampled at 44.1K a

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Krakora
OK, I took the 300HZ.wav file and retested locally with Asterisk 11.4 out of the equation. It is sampled at 44.1K and motorboats with 'resample-method' set to any value. If I convert the file to 8K it then plays fine with 'resample-method' set to any value. I am confused. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Krakora
Hello, I had 'resample-method' set to 'speex-float-1' when it was previously set to the default which I believe is 'speex-float-3'. I meant to set it to 'speex-float-10' to see if the "motor-boating" would go away...looks like I forgot the '0'. The wave files over SIP via Asterisk 11.4 now soun

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC next v0 02/11] bluetooth: Add basic backend->core notifications

2013-06-24 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:46 +0200, Mikel Astiz wrote: > From: Mikel Astiz > > Make a clear split to define an API implementing transport operations, > and how these backends should report the events to the Bluetooth core. > --- > src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.c | 143 > ++

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC next v0 01/11] bluetooth: Add backend infrastructure with core->backend reporting

2013-06-24 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:46 +0200, Mikel Astiz wrote: > +int pa_bt_backend_register(pa_bluetooth_discovery *y, pa_bluetooth_backend > *b, enum profile p, void *bp); > +void pa_bt_backend_unregister(pa_bluetooth_discovery *y, > pa_bluetooth_backend *b, enum profile p); Could we use just one bluet

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC next v0 01/11] bluetooth: Add backend infrastructure with core->backend reporting

2013-06-24 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:46 +0200, Mikel Astiz wrote: > From: Mikel Astiz > > Components other than BlueZ can also implement Bluetooth profiles and > some infrastructure is required to keep the codebase cleanly split. > --- > src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.c | 32 ++

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 24.06.2013 21:03, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen: On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 11:36 -0400, Robert Krakora wrote: Basically, the 300Hz tone "motor boats" when played over SIP via Asterisk. Every tone that previously played well over SIP via Asterisk then also "motor boats". (Please don't top-post.) If you

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] protocol-esound/http/simple: Make sure callers can handle iochannel_write changes

2013-06-24 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 17:29 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > With the new behaviour, you will not always get a callback after a > successful write. Make sure the callers can properly handle this. > > Signed-off-by: David Henningsson > --- > src/pulsecore/protocol-esound.c | 15 +--

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 11:36 -0400, Robert Krakora wrote: > Basically, the 300Hz tone "motor boats" when played over SIP via Asterisk. > Every tone that previously played well over SIP via Asterisk then also > "motor boats". (Please don't top-post.) If you record from the alsa sink while this moto

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC] When maxlength and adjust_latency are set, do not allow higher latencies

2013-06-24 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 16:28 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > @@ -351,6 +353,12 @@ static void increase_watermark(struct userdata *u) { > new_min_latency = PA_MIN(old_min_latency * 2, old_min_latency + > TSCHED_WATERMARK_INC_STEP_USEC); > new_min_latency = PA_MIN(new_min_latency, > u->s

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC] When maxlength and adjust_latency are set, do not allow higher latencies

2013-06-24 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 16:28 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > Assume that we *really really* want no more than 10 ms of latency, and > there are occasional underruns. Now the latency will increase, first to 1 ms, > then 2 ms, 4 ms, 8 ms, 16 ms. At that point, when the sink's latency > is 16 ms and

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Krakora
Basically, the 300Hz tone "motor boats" when played over SIP via Asterisk. Every tone that previously played well over SIP via Asterisk then also "motor boats". On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Robert Krakora < rob.krak...@messagenetsystems.com> wrote: > Hi Tanu, > > Here is my setup. I have a

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Robert Krakora
Hi Tanu, Here is my setup. I have a machine that is utilizing Asterisk 11.4 to send a 300Hz tone sampled at 44.1K to another machine via SIP running Asterisk 11.4 and PulseAudio 4.0. The source machine does not have PulseAudio installed and it running ALSA 1.0.25. The sink machine does have Pul

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] protocol-esound/http/simple: Make sure callers can handle iochannel_write changes

2013-06-24 Thread David Henningsson
With the new behaviour, you will not always get a callback after a successful write. Make sure the callers can properly handle this. Signed-off-by: David Henningsson --- src/pulsecore/protocol-esound.c | 15 +-- src/pulsecore/protocol-http.c | 10 +++--- src/pulsecore/proto

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-24 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 08:56 -0400, Robert Krakora wrote: > Hi All, > > I have been struggling with Pulse Audio since version 2.1 to play different > wav files that play fine with straight ALSA. A co-worker found a 300 Hz > tone that is played by our system to warn of an emergency event kills Puls

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] RFC: pa_database to adopt hdf5?

2013-06-24 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 22:32 -0700, Jason Newton wrote: > Hi, > > I've been using HDF5 [ http://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/whatishdf5.html ] > in my own applications alot recently and I thought pulseaudio may have > overlooked this library for it's own problems given HDF's > scientific-field origins.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [Git pull] Big cleanup branch

2013-06-24 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 22:30 +0200, Damir Jelić wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:00:32PM +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 20:56 +0200, Damir Jelić wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:48:35PM +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 17:06 +0200, Damir Jeli

[pulseaudio-discuss] pulsaudio hang when try to unload/load module

2013-06-24 Thread Paolo Tagliavini
Good morning, I'm working on iMX23 platform using build root. My product need use of pulsaudio2.1 and bluez 4.101. Those package are in blunde with build root and all work fine with exception of pulsaudio unload -> load modules. eg: pactl load-module module-loopback pactl unload-module MODULE NU

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] kernel-rt

2013-06-24 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 20:14 +0200, Mario Moles wrote: > Hi! > I use kernel-rt in ROSA-linux and pulseaudio crashs after a few minutes: > With a standard-kernel all is ok! > What can I do to report the bug? How to report a bug: register an account on bugs.freedesktop.org and go to https://bugs.free

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Bluetooth devices no longer detected after upgrade from 2.0 to 4.0

2013-06-24 Thread Mikel Astiz
Hi Georg, On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Georg Chini wrote: > Hello, > > after upgrading to Pulseaudio 4.0 my bluetooth devices (headset, 2 mobiles) > are no longer discovered. I am running Debian unstable on an amd64 CPU, > the new Debian package was released a few days ago. > I also filed a b

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] PulseAudio on Android kernel, for Ubuntu phone

2013-06-24 Thread David Henningsson
On 05/27/2013 08:57 PM, David Henningsson wrote: Well, as some of you already know, Canonical is currently working on an Ubuntu phone product. Part of that is a well working audio stack. In short, we're trying to build something where we can run as much of standard Ubuntu as possible and as litt