Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [alsa-devel] PulseAudio and softvol

2013-06-25 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 08:31 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > On 05/15/2013 06:28 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote: [...] > > Yes, but the invocation of PCM softvol isn't guaranteed to be first > > before the reference to the already existing user ctl element. > > snd_mixer_open() can be called before that.

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] todo: Add plans for the bluetooth modules

2013-06-25 Thread jprvita
From: João Paulo Rechi Vita These plans were discussed and agreed upon through IRC on 2013-06-25 by Arun, João Paulo, Luiz, Mikel and Tanu. --- todo | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/todo b/todo index 653bedc..3dc4df2 100644 --- a/todo +++ b/todo @@ -45,3 +45,14 @@

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Welcome to the "pulseaudio-discuss" mailing list

2013-06-25 Thread GUO LI
I tested on cygwin on windows, even the pulseaudio server won't start at all. On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Ansis Māliņš wrote: > Please report any and all progress you make.​ > > ___ > pulseaudio-discuss mailing list > pulseaudio-discuss@lists.fr

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Welcome to the "pulseaudio-discuss" mailing list

2013-06-25 Thread Ansis Māliņš
Please report any and all progress you make.​ ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 00/21] Add a basic node concept

2013-06-25 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 18:39 +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > This patch set adds pa_node, pa_port_node, pa_sink_node, > pa_source_node, pa_sink_input_node and pa_source_output node structs > to the core. Node support is added for some backends: alsa, bluetooth, > jack, and native streams. I didn't imp

[pulseaudio-discuss] [Git pull] Big pa_bool -> bool cleanup branch

2013-06-25 Thread Damir Jelić
Hi. I played around with sed some more and replaced pa_bool with bool. Patches are in this branch on github: https://github.com/poljar/pulseaudio/tree/bool Thanks. ___ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org http://

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Pulse Audio 4.0 gets killed by 300 Hz tone...never recovers

2013-06-25 Thread Robert Krakora
The Speex sample rate converter has problems it appears and consumes and inordinate amount of CPU upwards of 57% when converting from 44.1 to 48 and it still sounds bad. Even with the Audacity generated 300Hz tone at 44.1 the quality does not improve. If I suspend PulseAudio 4.0 and play with str

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] doc: Update LICENSE to reflect optional libpulse dep on libdbus

2013-06-25 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 13:59 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > On 06/25/2013 01:49 PM, Arun Raghavan wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 08:57 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > >> Hmm, are there optional dependencies to libdbus that cause it to become > >> GPL, or why would anyone choose GPL for libdbu

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC next v0 04/11] bluetooth: Add embedded BlueZ backend inside bluetooth-util

2013-06-25 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:46 +0200, Mikel Astiz wrote: > From: Mikel Astiz > > BlueZ 5 supports external profiles, meaning that certain Bluetooth > profiles (e.g. HFP/HSP) are completely handled outside BlueZ. > > However, some other profiles (i.e. A2DP) are still implemented inside > BlueZ, so l

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] doc: Update LICENSE to reflect optional libpulse dep on libdbus

2013-06-25 Thread David Henningsson
On 06/25/2013 01:49 PM, Arun Raghavan wrote: On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 08:57 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: Hmm, are there optional dependencies to libdbus that cause it to become GPL, or why would anyone choose GPL for libdbus? I believe some folks don't like the Academic Free License. This migh

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH] doc: Update LICENSE to reflect optional libpulse dep on libdbus

2013-06-25 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 08:57 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > Hmm, are there optional dependencies to libdbus that cause it to become > GPL, or why would anyone choose GPL for libdbus? I believe some folks don't like the Academic Free License. This might explain the reasons: https://www.gnu.org/

[pulseaudio-discuss] No volume control for audio from java applet in browser

2013-06-25 Thread Andrew Skretvedt
Hello list, I have a playback volume control question: I'm running Crunchbang Linux, Firefox 21, and icedtea for Java... I like to listen to WebSDR sites, which mostly use java applets for their audio delivery. These play fine in my browser, but I get no volume slider in pavucontrol's playback tab

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [RFC next v0 03/11] bluetooth: Add backend->core notification of new transports

2013-06-25 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:46 +0200, Mikel Astiz wrote: > From: Mikel Astiz > > Backends are responsible for the notification of new transports, which > is backend-dependant. The core still holds ownership of the transport > objects. > --- > src/modules/bluetooth/bluetooth-util.c | 45 > +

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] RFC: pa_database to adopt hdf5?

2013-06-25 Thread Jason Newton
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Ian Malone wrote: > Having followed this thread for a while I'm wondering why HDF5, which > seems geared towards large numerical datasets and rather specialist, > would be preferable to sqlite if a dedicated database library is > needed for application settings.