Hi Lennart,
I think you're wrong about this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753882
You're claiming that PA will only work if XDG_RUNTIME_DIR remains the same
as the original user. However, PA will use the PULSE_SERVER X11 property
instead of
using XDG_RUNTIME_DIR, so this enviro
On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 13:54 +0100, Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Am 11.11.2013 12:43, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
> > On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 20:29 +0100, Thomas Martitz wrote:
> >> Am 08.11.2013 14:46, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
> >>> The effect of the \deprecated tag is (for a reason unknown to me) that
> >>> all
2013/11/11 Tanu Kaskinen :
> On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 02:34 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>> Peter Meerwald wrote:
>>
>> > some resampler implementations (e.g. libsamplerate and ffmpeg) do not
>> > consume
>> > the entire input buffer; the impl_resample() function now has a return
>> > value
>
Am 11.11.2013 12:43, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 20:29 +0100, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 08.11.2013 14:46, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
The effect of the \deprecated tag is (for a reason unknown to me) that
all documentation for the tagged entity is removed. That's not nice,
so this pa
On Sat, 2013-11-09 at 02:34 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Peter Meerwald wrote:
>
> > some resampler implementations (e.g. libsamplerate and ffmpeg) do not
> > consume
> > the entire input buffer; the impl_resample() function now has a return value
> > returning the number of frames in th
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 20:29 +0100, Thomas Martitz wrote:
> Am 08.11.2013 14:46, schrieb Tanu Kaskinen:
> > The effect of the \deprecated tag is (for a reason unknown to me) that
> > all documentation for the tagged entity is removed. That's not nice,
> > so this patch replaces the tag with plain te
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 23:18 +0600, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> In pa_sink_input_request_rewind, nbytes == 0 means "rewind as far as
> possible". However, I think I have found (by code inspection) a case
> where it is not honored. The case is where
> i->thread_info.rewrite_nbytes is a
> > I have rebased and reviewed patches 1-5, and all looked good, so pushed.
> > I'll continue the review later (hopefully today).
>
> I pushed patches 6, 7 and 8 too. Patch 9 had some issues (see my reply
> to that patch), so I'm waiting for updated versions of patches 9-11.
will do, thanks, p.
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:44 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 23:14 +0200, Peter Meerwald wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > the patch series aims to resubmit a patch to reorder the resampling
> > pipeline; it former patch was dropped due to issues with leftover data
> > handling; patc
