Hi PulseAudio list,
Note: please keep me in CC, i'm not registered on this list.
I've been having this issue for as long as i use Linux (with
pulseaudio) but never really bothered to look into the issue and try
to resolve it. That's something i've been trying to tackle for a few
days now without
On 2014-09-28 11:23, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
The logic for choosing the runtime directory is complicated enough
also without adding PULSE_RUNTIME_PATH into the mix. XDG_RUNTIME_DIR
is sufficient for users to control the runtime directory.
PULSE_RUNTIME_PATH has not been documented, so this change
On 2014-09-26 23:20, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 9/24/14, 1:17 AM, David Henningsson wrote:
On 2014-09-23 22:34, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 9/18/14, 2:13 AM, David Henningsson wrote:
Calling snd_pcm_avail/delay causes a syscall to the kernel, which
communicates with the audio hardwa
29.09.2014 18:16, David Henningsson wrote:
Ah, now I get it - the problem is not that the buffer might become half
empty, the problem is that you might estimate to sleep too long, so your
process time is effectively cut in half: if you previously had problems
with process times > 20 ms, you can n
If nobody tried it, I might test the patch on my USB DAC. The problem is
that I'm not sure what's the best way to benchmark the playback. Do you
have some tips on that?
Laurentiu
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014, at 15:16, David Henningsson wrote:
>
>
> On 2014-09-26 23:20, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> >
On 2014-09-29 16:33, Laurențiu Nicola wrote:
If nobody tried it, I might test the patch on my USB DAC. The problem is
that I'm not sure what's the best way to benchmark the playback. Do you
have some tips on that?
Run "top" in a low-latency playback scenario, that should be enough. You
might
On 2014-09-29 14:49, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
29.09.2014 18:16, David Henningsson wrote:
Ah, now I get it - the problem is not that the buffer might become half
empty, the problem is that you might estimate to sleep too long, so your
process time is effectively cut in half: if you previous